o Adam,
>
> That's great - that will be very useful.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nick
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* Adam Snape
> *Sent:* 31 May 2018 19:07:05
> *To:* Nick Whitelegg
> *Cc:* Robert Whittaker (OSM lists); Talk GB
>
> *Subject:*
Hello Adam,
That's great - that will be very useful.
Thanks,
Nick
From: Adam Snape
Sent: 31 May 2018 19:07:05
To: Nick Whitelegg
Cc: Robert Whittaker (OSM lists); Talk GB
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Council Footpath data
Hi Nick,
Yes Hampshire's data
Robert,
thanks for chasing the East Riding of Yorkshire council to receive their
rights of way data licenced as OGL. I failed to get this but your
tenacity, knowledge and skilful wording made the difference. Thanks again.
Chris
On 30/05/2018 22:47, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
On
From: Adam Snape
Sent: 30 May 2018 11:37:47
To: Nick Whitelegg
Cc: Robert Whittaker (OSM lists); talk-gb
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Council Footpath data
Hi,
Just a word of warning to double check the licensing terms before use. Many
councils' licensing is ambiguous
On 30 May 2018 at 11:37, Adam Snape wrote:
> Over the coming months I'm hoping to individually clarify licensing with all
> of the authorities which haven't explicitly, unambiguously and publicly
> licensed their RoW data under OGL3 (and, yes, I know that's most of them).
> I'll also try and get
Hi,
Just a word of warning to double check the licensing terms before use. Many
councils' licensing is ambiguous in that they'll refer to the OGL then
state or link to the incompatible OS Open Data attribution terms.
Whilst it's a wonderful resource and I think Barry has done a great job,
the
Thanks for that - looks like a few councils are OGL which means we should
theoretically be able to add designation tags from the council data.
Agree about not copying the data verbatim from council data - am more
interested in giving people a way to easily identify council paths unmapped on
On 24 May 2018 at 14:33, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
> Following on from the recent topic regarding 1900 historical footpath data,
> I'd like to clarify exactly what we can and can't do currently with the
> council RoWs if possible.
>
> a) Copy designation status from
8 matches
Mail list logo