Re: [Talk-GB] Footpath numbering

2010-03-17 Thread Gregory
When living in Durham last year I would get the free local paper through the door and flick straight to the planning notices. If a footpath was closed I got it's reference number from the description, and sometimes 2-4 other references. Occasionally I got a road name that I had missed (broken sign

Re: [Talk-GB] Footpath numbering

2010-03-17 Thread Mike Collinson
And I discovered something interesting that may be applicable countrywide. A member of the Ramblers Association kindly made a definitive footpath map for me in the 1970s - hand-inked on the Otley and Ilkley OS 1:25000 sheets. As I recall, this was around the time the original PRoW survey was do

Re: [Talk-GB] Footpath numbering

2010-03-17 Thread Gregory Williams
> -Original Message- > From: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb- > boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Nick Whitelegg > Sent: 17 March 2010 10:22 > To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Footpath numbering > > >I wouldn?t tak

Re: [Talk-GB] Footpath numbering

2010-03-17 Thread David Groom
- Original Message - From: "Nick Whitelegg" To: Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 10:21 AM Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Footpath numbering > >>I wouldn?t take PRoW refs from any source unless I was completely > confident that it?s compatible with OSM?s license > >

Re: [Talk-GB] Footpath numbering

2010-03-17 Thread Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
om: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb- >boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Bob Hawkins >Sent: 17 March 2010 8:52 AM >To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org >Subject: [Talk-GB] Footpath numbering > >Footpaths and bridleways are numbered on definitive maps but rarely on &

Re: [Talk-GB] Footpath numbering

2010-03-17 Thread Nick Whitelegg
>I wouldn?t take PRoW refs from any source unless I was completely confident that it?s compatible with OSM?s license Sorry, meant to raise this point in my last reply. Would "any source" also include footpath signs with the number on? This is common practice on the Isle of Wight, and I myself

Re: [Talk-GB] Footpath numbering

2010-03-17 Thread Nick Whitelegg
>I wouldn?t take PRoW refs from any source unless I was completely confident that it?s compatible with OSM?s license. It sounds like your Chiltern Society >map is an annotated OS map, therefore unsuitable. Is it though? (I don't know, just a rhetorical question) The OS did not come up with the

Re: [Talk-GB] Footpath numbering

2010-03-17 Thread Gregory Williams
s are put up on signs. In the last few years I've found that my area of Kent have done pretty well with getting refs displayed. From: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Bob Hawkins Sent: 17 March 2010 08:52 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.o

Re: [Talk-GB] Footpath numbering

2010-03-17 Thread Thomas Wood
Bob Hawkins wrote: > Footpaths and bridleways are numbered on definitive maps but rarely on > signposts or waymarks. Often numbered on a parish or community basis > (HA10, for example), their use appears to be for legal puposes mainly, > rather than as an aid to navigation. Having said that, m

[Talk-GB] Footpath numbering

2010-03-17 Thread Bob Hawkins
Footpaths and bridleways are numbered on definitive maps but rarely on signposts or waymarks. Often numbered on a parish or community basis (HA10, for example), their use appears to be for legal puposes mainly, rather than as an aid to navigation. Having said that, my local Chiltern Society fo