Re: [Talk-GB] GB Coastline - PGS vs OS

2016-12-12 Thread Malcolm Herring
On 12/12/2016 09:42, Stuart Reynolds wrote: sand is shown all the way out to the end of the pier A practical solution to tidal beach areas is to map them as two areas with a common bound, that being the MHW nominal coastline. The areas above MHW can optionally carry the tag "tidal=no", but th

Re: [Talk-GB] GB Coastline - PGS vs OS

2016-12-12 Thread Stuart Reynolds
<mailto:talk-gb@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] GB Coastline - PGS vs OS Colin I was more talking about the actual shape of the MHW rather than its position; if that makes sense. some examples of problems in the Isle of Wight 1) There's a section here http://www.openstr

Re: [Talk-GB] GB Coastline - PGS vs OS

2016-12-12 Thread Colin Smale
to cover is the islet and rocks which are above sea > level even at high water level. (See the Looe link again) > > Jason (Unieagle) > > - > > FROM: David Groom > SENT: 12 December 2016 00:51 > TO: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org > SUBJECT: Re: [T

Re: [Talk-GB] GB Coastline - PGS vs OS

2016-12-11 Thread Jason Woollacott
(Unieagle) From: David Groom Sent: 12 December 2016 00:51 To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] GB Coastline - PGS vs OS Colin I was more talking about the actual shape of the MHW rather than its position; if that makes sense. some examples of problems in the Isle o

Re: [Talk-GB] GB Coastline - PGS vs OS

2016-12-11 Thread David Groom
4) More inaccuracies here http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/50.76650/-1.30029 David -- Original Message -- From: "Colin Smale" To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Sent: 11/12/2016 22:17:44 Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] GB Coastline - PGS vs OS Hi David, Looking at the spot y

Re: [Talk-GB] GB Coastline - PGS vs OS

2016-12-11 Thread Colin Smale
This discusses the accuracy of the MHW/MLW data http://eprints.hrwallingford.co.uk/554/1/HRPP523_Error_analysis_of_Ordnance_Survey_map_tidelines.pdf //colin On 2016-12-11 23:17, Colin Smale wrote: > Hi David, > > Looking at the spot you indicate on Bing imagery does indeed look like MHW >

Re: [Talk-GB] GB Coastline - PGS vs OS

2016-12-11 Thread Colin Smale
Hi David, Looking at the spot you indicate on Bing imagery does indeed look like MHW should be above the salt-marsh areas. Looking at Google[1] it is however possible that the grass doesn't quite get submerged, even at the highest tides, so it might also be possible that it is strictly correct.

Re: [Talk-GB] GB Coastline - PGS vs OS

2016-12-11 Thread David Groom
I suspect that even though much of the coastline is tagged "source=PGS" is has been amended by reference to Yahoo and after that Bing imagery, but the subsequent editors did not remove the "source=PGS" tag. Certainly comparing your gpx file for the Isle of Wight with the coastline currently in

[Talk-GB] GB Coastline - PGS vs OS

2016-12-11 Thread Colin Smale
Hi, Most of the coastline is currently tagged as "source=PGS". As part of the Boundary-Line open data set OS provide MHW lines which look to be significantly better than the PGS data: * Much newer - updated twice a year, although I am not sure how old the actual underlying survey data i