Re: [Talk-GB] JOSM Imagery

2012-10-31 Thread Dave F.
On 31/10/2012 10:02, Philip Barnes wrote: Field boundaries will need a survey, to ensure they still exist before they are traced. Through the 70s to the 90s a lot were ripped out to create larger fields. Phil Phil, I agree boundaries are best surveyed & many were destroyed, but think

Re: [Talk-GB] JOSM Imagery

2012-10-31 Thread Henry Gomersall
On Wed, 2012-10-31 at 10:02 +, Philip Barnes wrote: > Field boundaries will need a survey, to ensure they still exist > before they are traced. > > Through the 70s to the 90s a lot were ripped out to create larger > fields. Presumably one can do a check with Bing? (obv not as good as a surv

Re: [Talk-GB] JOSM Imagery

2012-10-31 Thread Philip Barnes
Field boundaries will need a survey, to ensure they still exist before they are traced. Through the 70s to the 90s a lot were ripped out to create larger fields. Phil -- Sent from my Nokia N9 On 30/10/2012 21:33 Dudley Ibbett wrote: Hi My version of JOSM seems to have just updated on my F

Re: [Talk-GB] JOSM Imagery

2012-10-31 Thread Michael Collinson
On 30/10/2012 22:33, Dudley Ibbett wrote: Hi My version of JOSM seems to have just updated on my Fedora system and I now have NLS OS 1:25k 1st Series 1937-61 imagery. I am probably behind the times but presumably this can be used for mapping. If someone could confirm its use this would be a

Re: [Talk-GB] JOSM Imagery

2012-10-30 Thread Dudley Ibbett
Hi My version of JOSM seems to have just updated on my Fedora system and I now have NLS OS 1:25k 1st Series 1937-61 imagery. I am probably behind the times but presumably this can be used for mapping. If someone could confirm its use this would be appreciated. I appreciate its accuracy wi