On 3 Sep 2009, at 23:15, Mark Williams wrote:
> David Earl wrote:
>> On 03/09/2009 14:53, Peter Miller wrote:
>>> This looks like messing with a street and yahoo photography shows
>>> it as going through a house. This appears to be straight forward
>>> vandalism
>>> http://www.openstreetmap.
David Earl wrote:
> On 03/09/2009 14:53, Peter Miller wrote:
>> This looks like messing with a street and yahoo photography shows it
>> as going through a house. This appears to be straight forward vandalism
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/5215590
>
> Yes, looking at the Yahoo images,
On 03/09/2009 18:18, David Earl wrote:
> I'm going to revert these two changesets now.
2359068 was OK, but the later one, 2359116 already has a conflict.
David
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/
On 03/09/2009 14:53, Peter Miller wrote:
> This looks like messing with a street and yahoo photography shows it
> as going through a house. This appears to be straight forward vandalism
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/5215590
Yes, looking at the Yahoo images, I agree completely.
I'm g
On 03/09/2009 14:53, Peter Miller wrote:
> Here he has added goods=yes to a railway line. Is this correct?
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4356960/history
No: I just did a search for a journey on the national rail website and
it gives me trains between the two stations either side, with
Liam123 is back, however some of his edits moving bus stops might be
reasonable.
This might be ok (moving bus stop to side of road)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/469765466
Here he has added goods=yes to a railway line. Is this correct?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/435696
6 matches
Mail list logo
