[Talk-GB] Liam123 back again - can we check if this is vandalism?

2009-09-03 Thread Peter Miller
Liam123 is back, however some of his edits moving bus stops might be reasonable. This might be ok (moving bus stop to side of road) http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/469765466 Here he has added goods=yes to a railway line. Is this correct?

Re: [Talk-GB] Liam123 back again - can we check if this is vandalism?

2009-09-03 Thread David Earl
On 03/09/2009 14:53, Peter Miller wrote: Here he has added goods=yes to a railway line. Is this correct? http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/4356960/history No: I just did a search for a journey on the national rail website and it gives me trains between the two stations either side, with

Re: [Talk-GB] Liam123 back again - can we check if this is vandalism?

2009-09-03 Thread David Earl
On 03/09/2009 14:53, Peter Miller wrote: This looks like messing with a street and yahoo photography shows it as going through a house. This appears to be straight forward vandalism http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/5215590 Yes, looking at the Yahoo images, I agree completely. I'm

Re: [Talk-GB] Liam123 back again - can we check if this is vandalism?

2009-09-03 Thread David Earl
On 03/09/2009 18:18, David Earl wrote: I'm going to revert these two changesets now. 2359068 was OK, but the later one, 2359116 already has a conflict. David ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-GB] Liam123 back again - can we check if this is vandalism?

2009-09-03 Thread Peter Miller
On 3 Sep 2009, at 23:15, Mark Williams wrote: David Earl wrote: On 03/09/2009 14:53, Peter Miller wrote: This looks like messing with a street and yahoo photography shows it as going through a house. This appears to be straight forward vandalism