[Talk-GB] Licences for Highways and PRoW data (Was: C roads again)

2014-08-13 Thread Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
On 12 August 2014 20:08, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote: We have discussed this subject a couple of times and have, I think, concluded that displaying the ref (generally only known to local government people) on roads that are unsigned is not helpful to the end user. Ignoring the

Re: [Talk-GB] Licences for Highways and PRoW data (Was: C roads again)

2014-08-13 Thread Lester Caine
On 13/08/14 12:15, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: As far as street names and numbers are concerned, it is the council that is the official authority on these. They have to maintain a written List of Streets Maintainable at the Public Expense. Again if you can persuade the council to let

Re: [Talk-GB] Licences for Highways and PRoW data (Was: C roads again)

2014-08-13 Thread Andy Robinson
The NSG is a closed shop run by the OS and other stakeholders for the management of street works. When the NSG was set up a few years ago I tried to get access and initially during their pilot I sort of did, but this was cut off when the system whet fully live and access limited to the LA's and

Re: [Talk-GB] Licences for Highways and PRoW data (Was: C roads again)

2014-08-13 Thread Lester Caine
On 13/08/14 15:40, Andy Robinson wrote: The NSG is a closed shop run by the OS and other stakeholders for the management of street works. When the NSG was set up a few years ago I tried to get access and initially during their pilot I sort of did, but this was cut off when the system whet

Re: [Talk-GB] Licences for Highways and PRoW data (Was: C roads again)

2014-08-13 Thread David Woolley
On 13/08/14 12:15, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote: They have to maintain a written List of Streets Maintainable at the Public Expense. Councils also allocate addresses for streets not maintained at public expense (and it is my impression that many new residential streets, including most