Re: [Talk-GB] Local walking routes

2010-08-08 Thread David Ellams
Thanks for your feedback, guys. On reflection, I now agree that route relations should generally be reserved for waymarked routes. I also agree with Richard F's comment that there is a need for a separate repository for sharing the sorts of unofficial routes I am talking about. Cheers David On

Re: [Talk-GB] Local walking routes

2010-08-05 Thread Richard Mann
If I go into my local bookshop, I would probably find at least a dozen books of local walks, all different. They'll have given each walk a name, sometimes fancy, sometimes simple. OK so I live in a bit of a tourist hotspot, but I think it has to be something a bit more formal than just having a nam

Re: [Talk-GB] Local walking routes

2010-08-05 Thread Brad Rogers
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 10:44:45 +0100 Richard Mann wrote: Hello Richard, > probably advise against putting them in the database unless they are > waymarked. There are named routes that aren't waymarked. Near me, for example, there's the Little Dart Ridge and Valley Walk. I'd be inclined to add th

Re: [Talk-GB] Local walking routes

2010-08-05 Thread Mike Harris
Hi As someone who does quite a bit of work on adding paths (including public rights of way) and walking routes to OSM my personal view would be to add relations only for routes which are either (a) waymarked as a route, and/or (b) carry a specific name e.g. "Little Sodding Millennium Walk".

Re: [Talk-GB] Local walking routes

2010-08-05 Thread Richard Fairhurst
David Ellams wrote: > With one exception, the routes themselves are not > signed/marked (though they follow waymarked paths). Don't tag them unless they're waymarked, _unless_ either they're proposed to be waymarked (in which case you could do so with a "state=proposed" tag on the relation), or

Re: [Talk-GB] Local walking routes

2010-08-05 Thread Richard Mann
I think that walking routes are much more flexible than (say) cycling routes, so there would be every prospect that umpteen different sets of overlapping routes could be created by different people. So I'd probably advise against putting them in the database unless they are waymarked. Richard On

[Talk-GB] Local walking routes

2010-08-04 Thread David Ellams
Where I live there is a Parish Paths Partnership (P3) Group, where volunteers work with the council on projects to maintain and improve access to public footpaths and brideways, e.g., waymarking, replacing stiles with gates, etc. They publish a number of suggested walks on their website (the walks