On 16 April 2011 20:19, andrew wrote:
> Many houses in the London suburbs and elsewhere have polygonal or curved
> bays
> with square-ended gables above them. A typical example is:
>
>
> http://geographyphotos.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/Ipswich/Gr5HlqvIzvDA/IAeFpmg6tFec
>
> Should we
I would say that a 2d representation of a 3d building should be its 2d
bounding polygon, i.e. its projection onto the ground. This is what you
see from vertically overhead (for above-ground buildings, and leaving
out effects of parallax for the moment). So in this case it would show
the straig
andrew writes:
>Should we be mapping the outline of the gable because it is the greatest extent
>of the building, the bay because it is the important bit or a straight line
>because the bay and gable are too small to map sensibly?
I think technically you should map what's at ground level. The b
Many houses in the London suburbs and elsewhere have polygonal or curved bays
with square-ended gables above them. A typical example is:
http://geographyphotos.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/Ipswich/Gr5HlqvIzvDA/IAeFpmg6tFec
Should we be mapping the outline of the gable because it is the
4 matches
Mail list logo
