Re: [Talk-GB] Moderation (WAS: Primary or Trunk? PITA?)

2013-11-04 Thread Jonathan
e too, the project is meant to be organic. Anyway, enough of the history lecture, let's please remember we are all friends here, we all share a common enjoyment and goal. Cheers Andy -Original Message- From: Tom Hughes [mailto:t...@compton.nu] Sent: 04 November 2013 08:35 To: Rob Ni

Re: [Talk-GB] Moderation (WAS: Primary or Trunk? PITA?)

2013-11-04 Thread Andy Robinson
are all friends here, we all share a common enjoyment and goal. Cheers Andy -Original Message- From: Tom Hughes [mailto:t...@compton.nu] Sent: 04 November 2013 08:35 To: Rob Nickerson; Talk-GB Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Moderation (WAS: Primary or Trunk? PITA?) On 04/11/13 00:23, Rob Nickers

Re: [Talk-GB] Moderation (WAS: Primary or Trunk? PITA?)

2013-11-04 Thread Lester Caine
Tom Hughes wrote: Lessons: * We should be able to explain the reasoning behind our tagging if asked. Absolutely, and I believe I did so. Tom - reading Rob's post I don't think he was directing anything at you, however like him, I was concerned about other posts in the thread! But what is m

Re: [Talk-GB] Moderation (WAS: Primary or Trunk? PITA?)

2013-11-04 Thread Tom Hughes
On 04/11/13 00:23, Rob Nickerson wrote: To summarise: a simple question was asked entirely inocently, and I am 100% sure that it was not meant to belittle 10 years of tagging. An answer was given in quite a "matter of fact" tone which in face to face communication would be fine but due to the un

[Talk-GB] Moderation (WAS: Primary or Trunk? PITA?)

2013-11-03 Thread Rob Nickerson
Hi all, I think its probably my turn to step in and moderate on this one given that Jonathan's original post stems from me asking him about some road classifications in his home town. To summarise: a simple question was asked entirely inocently, and I am 100% sure that it was not meant to belittl