On 15 Sep 2009, at 22:48, Thomas Wood wrote:
>
> ref/local_ref has been argued here in the past, I can't remember the
> reason for settling on the latter, I personally prefer the former.
ref should be a national reference whilst local_ref is a reference on
a more local basis, in this case usual
2009/9/15 Robert Naylor :
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:36:50 +0100, Thomas Wood
> wrote:
>
>> Sorry for the delay in getting back, the end of last week was marred
>> by not being able to get online.
>>
>> Anyway, I have now imported West Yorkshire (more on this in a bit),
>> Torbay and Thurrock.
>>
>
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:36:50 +0100, Thomas Wood
wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in getting back, the end of last week was marred
> by not being able to get online.
>
> Anyway, I have now imported West Yorkshire (more on this in a bit),
> Torbay and Thurrock.
>
Thanks for importing West Yorkshire
On 15 Sep 2009, at 08:36, Thomas Wood wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in getting back, the end of last week was marred
> by not being able to get online.
>
> Anyway, I have now imported West Yorkshire (more on this in a bit),
> Torbay and Thurrock.
>
> W.Yorks caused me a lot of problems:
> 1) napta
Sorry for the delay in getting back, the end of last week was marred
by not being able to get online.
Anyway, I have now imported West Yorkshire (more on this in a bit),
Torbay and Thurrock.
W.Yorks caused me a lot of problems:
1) naptan:Notes was populated, often with strings greater than 255
ch
Peter Miller wrote:
>
> On 10 Sep 2009, at 21:00, Mark Williams wrote:
[]
>> When I voted for Essex I had hoped that all of Essex might turn up,
>> but as far as I can see it's excluded Thurrock, a little unitary
>> authority in the S.W. corner - which is, naturally, the bit I wanted...
>>
>
>
On 10 Sep 2009, at 21:00, Mark Williams wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
On 7 Sep 2009, at 00:00, Frankie Roberto wrote:
Thomas wrote:
I'm following the Be Bold motto, and am now uploading the
remaining
NaPTAN counties that have been requested.
I'll probably do two or three at a time,
Peter Miller wrote:
>
> On 7 Sep 2009, at 00:00, Frankie Roberto wrote:
>
>> Thomas wrote:
>>
>> I'm following the Be Bold motto, and am now uploading the remaining
>> NaPTAN counties that have been requested.
>> I'll probably do two or three at a time, following the list
>> alpha
On 7 Sep 2009, at 00:00, Frankie Roberto wrote:
Thomas wrote:
I'm following the Be Bold motto, and am now uploading the remaining
NaPTAN counties that have been requested.
I'll probably do two or three at a time, following the list
alphabetically, possibly trying to avoid importing counties ne
Thomas wrote:
I'm following the Be Bold motto, and am now uploading the remaining
> NaPTAN counties that have been requested.
> I'll probably do two or three at a time, following the list
> alphabetically, possibly trying to avoid importing counties next to
> each other together.
>
> Tonight I've
2009/9/6 Richard Bullock :
> Hello Thomas,
>
> I am the right one for Cheshire East!
>
> I was out today and I thought I'd take a photo of one bus stop to see how
> the reference numbers on the bus stop compare with the import data.
This info will be useful to put on
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/
I'm following the Be Bold motto, and am now uploading the remaining
NaPTAN counties that have been requested.
I'll probably do two or three at a time, following the list
alphabetically, possibly trying to avoid importing counties next to
each other together.
Tonight I've uploaded Bristol and Chesh
12 matches
Mail list logo
