[apologies for broken threading, Nabble is still down]
Jon Pennycook wrote:
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2821036 and
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2821037 (claiming to be
> National Cycle Network Route 231 and 235) have been listed on
> OpenStreetMap for some time. They appe
Iff it is not existing then it should be deleted.
It is easy to do it in JOSM (after one
passes hurdle if doing anything in JOSM)
1 Sep 2020, 11:52 by jpennyc...@bcs.org.uk:
> Hello.
>
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2821036> and >
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2821037>
Hello.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2821036 and
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2821037 (claiming to be National
Cycle Network Route 231 and 235) have been listed on OpenStreetMap for some
time. They appear to mostly duplicate Regional Cycle Network route 67 (
https://www.openstre
3 matches
Mail list logo