On 08/06/2012 16:02, John Sturdy wrote:
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Gregory wrote:
Is it not sensible to use the reference format of the place you are in,
rather than create some sudo standard?
A web application I'm developing straddles many counties. So I've decided
to adopt the scheme:
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Gregory wrote:
> Is it not sensible to use the reference format of the place you are in,
> rather than create some sudo standard?
>> A web application I'm developing straddles many counties. So I've decided
>> to adopt the scheme:
>> code-for-council:code-for-pa
Is it not sensible to use the reference format of the place you are in,
rather than create some sudo standard?
If a footpath is in County Durham, and I see OSM has it as ref="Footpath
5", then I know I can call Durham council and say "Repair footpath 5
please.".
If another footpath is in Newcastle
On Thu, 31 May 2012, Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
... (This is Worcestershire, and at the same time,
they've also split the paths up at every junction so that no path has
two routes leaving a junction, i.e. a path always ends at the first
junction of rights of way it comes to, and its continuati
On 31 May 2012 18:03, Rob Nickerson wrote:
> Q: Do we need to have a suggested way of tagging the reference numbers in
> ref=* ? So far I have seen the following in use:
>
> * Parish / path no. / link no. ==> For example: 417/26/1 (where the
> parish is a number code)
> * Area RoW_type Path_no
Wales) and very large, 6-digit numbers (Cumbria). We
should probably just make it free form rather than enforce a particular format.
Nick
-Rob Nickerson wrote: -
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
From: Rob Nickerson
Date: 31/05/2012 06:04PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] PRoW Ref codes (WAS:Hampshir
Fantastic news about Hamps PRoW data :-) Anyone else contacting their local
council can use this as an example case.
Q: Do we need to have a suggested way of tagging the reference numbers in
ref=* ? So far I have seen the following in use:
* Parish / path no. / link no.==> For example: 417/26
7 matches
Mail list logo