Re: [Talk-GB] Spamdalism caught

2015-10-20 Thread Colin Smale
020-3 is not a "virtual" number, it's a normal London number range. http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/telecoms/numbering/guidance-tele-no/london-area-code/ --colin On 2015-10-20 13:14, Philip Barnes wrote: > It came as little surprise that they have an 0203 number, which is a virtual >

Re: [Talk-GB] Spamdalism caught

2015-10-20 Thread Paul Sladen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Philip Barnes wrote: > an [(020) 3xxx ] number, Since 1999 the London dialing code and numbers have been: (020) Following the exhaustion in the '7xxx ' and '8xxx ' ranges a decade ago in c.2005, the

Re: [Talk-GB] Spamdalism caught

2015-10-20 Thread Paul Sladen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, Philip Barnes wrote: > my suspicion when seeing 0203 numbers, Apologies for being unclear. There is no such thing; quite simply: 020 Is the London dialing code, and has been for over 15 years. Local numbers in London have

[Talk-GB] Spamdalism caught

2015-10-19 Thread Amaroussi (OpenStreetMap)
Hi all, FYi, I just reverted a small yet disruptive case of spamdalism by user “Office Cleaners London” (did I just invent a new term for OSM?). Reverting changeset: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34735686 Offending changesets: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34468479 and

[Talk-GB] Spamdalism caught

2015-10-19 Thread Rob Nickerson
Don't think it was spam as I think they are actually based here. If true, this is user error in editing the road instead of adding a building/address. Rob ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org