The 'shell' of the building is not normally addressable so it would not
have a postcode allocated. I guess this has occured as postcode areas
normally would cover up to 100 properties. I note that the response in
the discussion seems to have come from a councillor at Peterborough City
Council s
On 2020-11-01 23:09, Kai Michael Poppe wrote:
> Hi Colin, Hi BD,
>
> as I live in a country with the maximum "anomality" are different 5-digit
> postcodes along a street (or sides of said street) I find different codes per
> building strange to say to least.
>
> I'd go for:
> * Remove addr:
Hi Colin, Hi BD,
as I live in a country with the maximum "anomality" are different 5-digit postcodes along a street (or sides of said street) I find different codes per building strange to say to least.
I'd go for:
* Remove addr
UK postcodes are for the delivery of mail and not intended to identify
buildings or parts of buildings. There will be loads of "anomalies" like
this. It's not crazy, it's just not what you are used to.
On 2020-11-01 22:16, BD wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> came across this quite strange arrangement:
>
Hi all, came across this quite strange arrangement: www.openstreetmap.org
www.openstreetmap.org As per comment in this changeset it seems that two
postcodes are dividing this building in half but not as I would expect.
Three floors with one postcode, three with another!? Crazy!I wan
5 matches
Mail list logo
