Re: [Talk-GB] rendering locks

2010-03-08 Thread Al Girling
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 12:32:59PM GMT, Richard Fairhurst wrote: Steve Chilton wrote: two nodes with waterway=lock_gate at either end of a way tagged waterway=canal;lock=yes and single node with waterway=lock OR lock=yes (with lock-gates not mapped) These are definitely

Re: [Talk-GB] rendering locks

2010-03-08 Thread Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists)
Al Girling wrote: Sent: 08 March 2010 4:49 PM To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] rendering locks On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 12:32:59PM GMT, Richard Fairhurst wrote: Steve Chilton wrote: two nodes with waterway=lock_gate at either end of a way tagged waterway=canal;lock=yes

Re: [Talk-GB] rendering locks

2010-03-01 Thread Dave F.
Steve Chilton wrote: Have submitted mapnik patches to SVN to render locks but unfortunately there isn't a standard way of tagging that makes it easy to be comprehensive. I have dealt with what I think are the two most logical options, which are: two nodes with waterway=lock_gate at either

Re: [Talk-GB] rendering locks

2010-02-28 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Steve Chilton wrote: two nodes with waterway=lock_gate at either end of a way tagged waterway=canal;lock=yes and single node with waterway=lock OR lock=yes (with lock-gates not mapped) These are definitely sensible. (I have a preference for the latter on the UK canal system.) I

Re: [Talk-GB] rendering locks

2010-02-28 Thread Chris Hill
Richard Fairhurst wrote: Steve Chilton wrote: two nodes with waterway=lock_gate at either end of a way tagged waterway=canal;lock=yes and single node with waterway=lock OR lock=yes (with lock-gates not mapped) These are definitely sensible. (I have a preference for the

Re: [Talk-GB] rendering locks

2010-02-28 Thread Andy Mabbett
On Sun, February 28, 2010 12:32, Richard Fairhurst wrote: Steve Chilton wrote: two nodes with waterway=lock_gate at either end of a way tagged waterway=canal;lock=yes and single node with waterway=lock OR lock=yes (with lock-gates not mapped) These are definitely sensible. (I have a

[Talk-GB] rendering locks

2010-02-27 Thread Steve Chilton
Have submitted mapnik patches to SVN to render locks but unfortunately there isn't a standard way of tagging that makes it easy to be comprehensive. I have dealt with what I think are the two most logical options, which are: two nodes with waterway=lock_gate at either end of a way tagged

Re: [Talk-GB] rendering locks

2010-02-27 Thread Dave F.
Hi Steve Not sure why, but your post's got mixed up in another thread. You might want to repost so it doesn't get missed by others. Steve Chilton wrote: Have submitted mapnik patches to SVN to render locks but unfortunately there isn't a standard way of tagging that makes it easy to be

[Talk-GB] rendering locks

2010-02-27 Thread Steve Chilton
Have submitted mapnik patches to SVN to render locks but unfortunately there isn't a standard way of tagging that makes it easy to be comprehensive. I have dealt with what I think are the two most logical options, which are: two nodes with waterway=lock_gate at either end of a way tagged