On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, Mike Harris wrote:
Also - to expand on Robert's response - we would need to be careful with the
field "alphanumeric" as it is fairly common for a PRoW to have a designation
that has a letter suffixed to the number, e.g. "Tushingham-cum-Grindley BR
19A" - ...
... I don't think
Hi
Thanks to David for raising this one and - as always - to Robert for a
well thought through response.
I would be happy for an automated change to be made to prow:ref (as long
as someone else does the work (:>) along the lines suggested by Robert.
I agree that road numbering takes priority
On 20 June 2012 12:44, David Groom wrote:
> I like the idea of prow:ref. I think footpath:ref a bit too specific, we'd
> then need bridleway:ref, not to mention boat:ref (for byways open to all
> traffic) which could be just TOO confusing!
[snip]
> In the UK at present there seem to be 7,004 ways
- Original Message -
From: "Gregory"
To: "Richard Fairhurst"
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2012 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] PRoW Ref tagging when ROW is also a road
On 19 June 2012 14:07, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
David Groom wrote:
> However at t
On 19 June 2012 14:11, Gregory wrote:
>> I use "admin:ref" for refs that are predominantly intended for
>> administrative usage, rather than public-facing usage.
>
> Now that sounds like tagging for the renderer.
No, that's not true. Please see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_
On 19 June 2012 12:59, David Groom wrote:
> a) Not a problem at all;
> b) simply a problem for the rendering, and no change to the tagging is
> required;
> c) a possible problem with the tagging?
I'd say c). It seems to me like the road reference number (e.g. A514)
and public right of way refere
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 14:33 +0100, Gregory wrote:
>
>
> On 19 June 2012 14:13, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Gregory wrote:
> > On 19 June 2012 14:07, Richard Fairhurst
> wrote:
>
> >> I use "admin:ref" for refs that are predominantly intended
> for
On 19 June 2012 14:13, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Gregory wrote:
> > On 19 June 2012 14:07, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> >> I use "admin:ref" for refs that are predominantly intended for
> >> administrative usage, rather than public-facing usage.
> > Now that sounds like tagging for the renderer.
Gregory wrote:
> On 19 June 2012 14:07, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
>> I use "admin:ref" for refs that are predominantly intended for
>> administrative usage, rather than public-facing usage.
> Now that sounds like tagging for the renderer.
How dare you! :p
In road terms, there is a big difference
On 19 June 2012 14:07, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> David Groom wrote:
> > However at the north end there is a (newly erected) public footpath
> > sign showing a footpath ref of B64, pointing straight down this road,
> > and the definitive map shows this as a footpath.
>
> I use "admin:ref" for ref
David Groom wrote:
> However at the north end there is a (newly erected) public footpath
> sign showing a footpath ref of B64, pointing straight down this road,
> and the definitive map shows this as a footpath.
I use "admin:ref" for refs that are predominantly intended for
administrative usage,
11 matches
Mail list logo
