On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 10:00 +0100, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
>
>
> >> I am wondering who it is and why. "THOU SHALT NOT REVERT" confirms>
> >> he/she/it knows what they are doing.
>
> >Agreed. This one is called "THE GENERAL SHALL NOT REVERT THEE"
> >http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12
>> I am wondering who it is and why. "THOU SHALT NOT REVERT" confirms>
>> he/she/it knows what they are doing.
>Agreed. This one is called "THE GENERAL SHALL NOT REVERT THEE"
>http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12777187
Actually that was the one I was thinking of - there isn't a THO
David Groom wrote:
> Can we get this reverted and block his account
Dreedled.
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Potential-Vandalism-tp5720594p5721082.html
Sent from the Great Britain mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
> I am wondering who it is and why. "THOU SHALT NOT REVERT" confirms
> he/she/it knows what they are doing.
Agreed. This one is called "THE GENERAL SHALL NOT REVERT THEE"
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12777187
Can we permanently block by IP?
_
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 23:16 +0100, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 20:37 +0100, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
> >> +1 for blocking
> >>
> >> Have contacted islandtoerag about silly edits in Southampton, no
> >> response.
> >> Time to block this destructive yob.
> >>
> >> Nick
> >+1 to bl
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 20:37 +0100, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
>> +1 for blocking
>>
>> Have contacted islandtoerag about silly edits in Southampton, no
>> response.
>> Time to block this destructive yob.
>>
>> Nick
>+1 to blocking
>
>He currently appears to be destroying the Long Island Expressway i
On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 20:37 +0100, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
> +1 for blocking
>
> Have contacted islandtoerag about silly edits in Southampton, no
> response.
> Time to block this destructive yob.
>
> Nick
+1 to blocking
He currently appears to be destroying the Long Island Expressway in New
York.
+1 for blocking
Have contacted islandtoerag about silly edits in Southampton, no response.
Time to block this destructive yob.
Nick
-"David Groom" wrote: -
To:
From: "David Groom"
Date: 18/08/2012 06:31PM
Subject: [Talk-GB] Potential Vandalism - AGAIN
islandmonkey seems to ha
;
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Baines [mailto:cbain...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: 14 August 2012 10:40
> > To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
> > Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Potential Vandalism
> >
> >
4 August 2012 10:40
> To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Potential Vandalism
>
> Forgot to add the link to the changeset! Here it is:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12724001
>
> ___
> Talk-GB mail
To: "talk-gb@openstreetmap.org"
From: Chris Baines
Date: 14/08/2012 10:42AM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Potential Vandalism
Forgot to add the link to the changeset! Here it is:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12724001
___
Talk-GB
Just noticed there are two more change sets in the same area, by the
same user as the above changeset:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12701798
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12701752
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstre
Forgot to add the link to the changeset! Here it is:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/12724001
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
13 matches
Mail list logo
