The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 539,
is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of a lot of
things happening in the openstreetmap world:
https://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/13975/
Enjoy!
Did you know that you can also submit messages for the weeklyOSM? Just log
Following a lack of answers to questions at
http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=5229644 (in
lots of cases they've responded, but have not actually answered the
question) with a DWG hat on I've sent them a message that they have to
read before continuing to map at
On 21/11/2020 15:56, ipswichmapper--- via Talk-GB wrote:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7521925
That is the relation I am talking about.
An edit made by user nplath seems to have made this relation into
a clone of the "Ipswich To Cambridge-Ely" relation. You can tell
JOSM preset is:
highway=path
bicycle=designated
foot=designated
segregated=no
I quite like it as it doesn't imply one use is preferred to another.
On 21/11/2020 10:28, Edward Bainton wrote:
Is there established tagging for a tarmac path that is ~1.5m wide, but
designated foot and cycles
There are several instances locally where a footpath across a field is
crossed by an electric fence.
The farmer usually fits a length of rubber hosepipe over the wire so
that walkers can safely step over the fence. Sometimes with the aid of a
couple of concrete blocks.
How to map?
5 matches
Mail list logo
