[Talk-GB] Coastline - my botched attempt to re-align ?

2015-10-23 Thread Bogus Zaba
A seawall was recently re-built in west Rhyl. As a result, and following two GPS surveys, earlier this week (Tue 20/10) I moved three features on the coast in West Rhyl. These were : the coastline, the boundary of a beach and the route of a cycleway which follows the new seawall. The cycle route

Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline - my botched attempt to re-align ?

2015-10-23 Thread Bogus Zaba
Thanks both SK53 and Shaun - I'll wait patiently. On 23/10/15 14:14, Shaun McDonald wrote: > Hi, > > The coastline is updated at a much slower pace compared to everything else, > so it's expected that it won't align for some time in the map rendering. It > could be days, weeks, or months

Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline - my botched attempt to re-align ?

2015-10-23 Thread SK53
This is most likely just the much slower update cycle for coastlines (which come from shape files regenerated from time-to-time). On 23 October 2015 at 14:02, Bogus Zaba wrote: > A seawall was recently re-built in west Rhyl. As a result, and following > two GPS surveys,

Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline - my botched attempt to re-align ?

2015-10-23 Thread Shaun McDonald
Hi, The coastline is updated at a much slower pace compared to everything else, so it's expected that it won't align for some time in the map rendering. It could be days, weeks, or months between coastline updates, and not minutely updates like all of the other OSM data. So don't worry about

[Talk-GB] osmweekly issue 274

2015-10-23 Thread Jinal Foflia
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue 274, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu Enjoy! weeklyOSM is brought to you by https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM Regards, Jinal Foflia

Re: [Talk-GB] User dataone: "splitting into 2 way to tag restriction "

2015-10-23 Thread ael
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:01:16PM +0100, Dave F. wrote: > Adding accurate data is, of course, improving OSM, but only if it's from an > allowable source. > > The lack of communication implies there's something to hide. Personally, I think that they should be blocked until they provide a proper