Re: [Talk-GB] [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Import Progress

2017-03-24 Thread Andy Robinson
Harry, and everyone else, I'm sure Brian will get back to everyone on all of this when he's back in circulation. He's not been around since these issues were raised. There is obviously a lot to digest and clearly there are some specific points to take on board so I'm sure when he's had time to

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] [Talk-GB] Import Progress

2017-03-24 Thread Andy Robinson
Harry, and everyone else, I'm sure Brian will get back to everyone on all of this when he's back in circulation. He's not been around since these issues were raised. There is obviously a lot to digest and clearly there are some specific points to take on board so I'm sure when he's had time to

Re: [Talk-GB] Countryside access map

2017-03-24 Thread Chris Hill
On 24/03/2017 19:17, ael wrote: On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 06:57:58PM +, Chris Hill wrote: On 24/03/2017 17:58, ael wrote: I have just noticed a newish mapper who has added many footpaths around Oxfordshire apparently using Bing but with changset comments "from countryside access map". Is

Re: [Talk-GB] Countryside access map

2017-03-24 Thread Dave F
Hi https://www.oxfordshire.gov.uk/cms/content/countryside-access-maps The PROWs are issued under OGL. The Crown Copyright is relevant to the OS map the PROWs have been overlaid on in this example *only*. https://www.oxfordshire.gov.uk/countrysidemap/ The PROW data remains OGL. This has been

Re: [Talk-GB] Countryside access map

2017-03-24 Thread ael
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 06:57:58PM +, Chris Hill wrote: > On 24/03/2017 17:58, ael wrote: > > I have just noticed a newish mapper who has added many footpaths around > > Oxfordshire apparently using Bing but with changset comments > > "from countryside access map". > > > > Is this copyright

Re: [Talk-GB] Countryside access map

2017-03-24 Thread David Woolley
On 24/03/17 18:47, Dave F wrote: What will? Isn't this issued under OGL? I think the questions were being asked because the copyright owner and licence status wasn't known. If it has OGL, it might actually be covered by Crown Copyright, which might result in a different period of time. I

[Talk-GB] weeklyOSM #348 14/03/2017-20/03/2017

2017-03-24 Thread weeklyteam
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 348, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/8885/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages

Re: [Talk-GB] Countryside access map

2017-03-24 Thread Chris Hill
On 24/03/2017 17:58, ael wrote: I have just noticed a newish mapper who has added many footpaths around Oxfordshire apparently using Bing but with changset comments "from countryside access map". Is this copyright free? I have sent a polite message welcoming to OSM, but pointing out that rural

Re: [Talk-GB] Countryside access map

2017-03-24 Thread Dave F
On 24/03/2017 18:30, David Woolley wrote: On 24/03/17 17:58, ael wrote: Is this copyright free? Under UK law, it will have, as a minimum, database rights for 15 years from publication. What will? Isn't this issued under OGL? DaveF --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast

Re: [Talk-GB] Countryside access map

2017-03-24 Thread David Woolley
On 24/03/17 17:58, ael wrote: Is this copyright free? Under UK law, it will have, as a minimum, database rights for 15 years from publication. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

[Talk-GB] Countryside access map

2017-03-24 Thread ael
I have just noticed a newish mapper who has added many footpaths around Oxfordshire apparently using Bing but with changset comments "from countryside access map". Is this copyright free? I have sent a polite message welcoming to OSM, but pointing out that rural footpaths usually need a visit,

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] [Talk-GB] Import Progress

2017-03-24 Thread Harry Wood
I've created a wiki page specifically about the tree data import. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Birmingham_City_Council_trees_data It would be better if somebody involved in running the import, would do this (per the Import Guidelines), but I've drawn together various info I could find

Re: [Talk-GB] [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Import Progress

2017-03-24 Thread Harry Wood
I've created a wiki page specifically about the tree data import. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Birmingham_City_Council_trees_data It would be better if somebody involved in running the import, would do this (per the Import Guidelines), but I've drawn together various info I could find

Re: [Talk-GB] [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Import Progress

2017-03-24 Thread Dan S
2017-03-24 11:31 GMT+00:00 Andy Mabbett : > On 24 March 2017 at 00:48, Andy Townsend wrote: > >> On 19/03/2017 14:57, Andy Mabbett wrote: >>> >>> "On 19 March 2017 at 13:13, ajt1...@gmail.com wrote: On 19/03/2017 12:52,

Re: [Talk-GB] [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Import Progress

2017-03-24 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 24 March 2017 at 00:48, Andy Townsend wrote: > On 19/03/2017 14:57, Andy Mabbett wrote: >> >> "On 19 March 2017 at 13:13, ajt1...@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>> On 19/03/2017 12:52, Andy Mabbett wrote: I'm told that Brian has been blocked for these

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM UK (was "Import Progress")

2017-03-24 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 24 March 2017 at 01:11, Andy Townsend wrote: > I suspect that it's unavoidable that if a prominent member of a group or > organisations says or does something, that people think that it's at the > very least condoned by that organisation. and: > (for the avoidance of