On 14.07.2020 17:21, o...@poppe.dev wrote:
> ... again, your wording sounds like you don't trust the organizations further
> that you could throw a rock and basically discard their efforts as those of
> money-hungry, evil corporations that aren't interested in the humanitarian
> aspect at all
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 09:30:00PM +0100, Adam Snape wrote:
>
> this point if we're actually advocating the hitherto undocumented usage of
> segregated=yes to mean 'cycleway is separate from main carriageway' because
> I suspect I'm not the only one whose been using it as per the wiki to show
>
I'm not saying it's terrible but as you note it's not exactly an optimum
example of good mapping.
Just as with roads, I tend to view cycleway surface tags as distinctly
optional/low priority where they confirm to the default of being asphalt
and of great importance where they deviate from that
I do have to say that surface info is very useful. A lot of cycleways have
gravel sections and that can be no fun on, say, a Brompton bike with 16” wheels.
Much like pavements, I’d start my focus on the details which are not what you
might expect, like where a road doesn’t have a pedestrian
Quite agree, whilst harmless oneway=no seems a bit OTT, as tbh does marking
the surface on every single asphalt cycleway...
I have utmost respect for cyclestreets but that tagging guidance does seem
garbled at points
Since when has the segregated=yes/no tag on a cycleway referred to the
Hi Andy and mappamercia
I've delved into this some more and it appears that the Geopark is a
collection of pre-existing sites so mapping them as a relation shouldn't be
too difficult. However the list of sites is published on the geopark
website
> I've been asked to clarify this as it might come across as a personal
> attack which was not intended, sorry.
Apology accepted, but ...
> The, very well funded, organizations in OSM space that claim
> "Humanitarian" for themselves, market themselves mainly by having a
> never ending stream of
I've been asked to clarify this as it might come across as a personal
attack which was not intended, sorry.
The, very well funded, organizations in OSM space that claim
"Humanitarian" for themselves, market themselves mainly by having a
never ending stream of emergencies (some real, some not,
"Is it one-way? oneway=yes / oneway=no"
is it really a good idea to always include oneway=no?
I would consider it as kind of pointless to require
oneway tag to be always present
I added some advertisement for StreetComplete
(I implemented for example bicycle_parking quests
as part of my plan for
Thanks Frederik,
Looking on the positive side, it's nice to know that people out there want
our maps.
Regards,
Jez
On Mon, 13 Jul 2020, 20:56 Frederik Ramm, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the DWG has received the following message:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > A bit of feedback.
> > The openstreet map
10 matches
Mail list logo
