Personally, I would map a small number of recycling containers as a single
node, tagged with all the types accepted. From my experience, these
containers often get moved around, at least here in Edinburgh, so their
relative positions change depending on which was overflowing last or
something. I
I must admit to being surprised that we dont have a distinct value:
recycling points are much commoner throughout Europe than they are in the
UK (probably because more people live in flats). Windsor & Maidenhead
withdrew at least some of their points when recycling bins were introduced.
In
Agreed, "point" sucks as a value, I won't use itmy fundamental reason
for it not being a 'centre' was size, but a Recycling Point _could_ be seen
as a mini Recycling Centre that only accepts recyclable waste. You can see
a perimeter boundary by the concrete area it is set on. I could go with a
Op do 26 nov. 2020 om 19:21 schreef Jez Nicholson :
> Okay, bear with. I know that this is detailed mapping, but I enquired a
> while ago on the amenity:recycling talk page and a single recycling
> container == a single node. A group of containers == a group of nodes.
>
> Here is an image of the
4 matches
Mail list logo
