Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] [Talk-GB] Review plan for adding 1, 164 wikidata tags in the West Midlands

2016-01-17 Thread Edward Betts
Rob Nickerson wrote: > Thanks for your work on this and for being able to do it so soon after the > January Mappa Mercia meeting. I find that the data your matching algorithm > produces (e.g. the duplicates that you will skip) is a fantastic QA tool > and highlights that there are areas where Open

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] [Imports] Review plan for adding 1, 164 wikidata tags in the West Midlands

2016-01-17 Thread Edward Betts
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > I have started some time ago to add wikidata tags manually myself and have > found that there are a few problems to be careful about. Will you be > checking the matches you have found to see if there would be contradictions > between single wikidata statements and curr

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] [Talk-GB] Review plan for adding 1, 164 wikidata tags in the West Midlands

2016-01-17 Thread Edward Betts
Lester Caine wrote: > If there is not a node for a village in the OSM data, then it needs > adding. While wikipedia may return the same page for the village and the > matching parish, I thought that wikidata should distinguish between a > village record and a parish one? For now Wikidata tends to

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] [Talk-GB] Review plan for adding 1, 164 wikidata tags in the West Midlands

2016-01-17 Thread Edward Betts
Lester Caine wrote: > On 17/01/16 11:08, Edward Betts wrote: > > This is the list of Wikidata tags that I actually plan to add: > > > > https://edwardbetts.com/osm-wikidata/west_midlands/matches_2016-01-16.txt > > Please remove the School list from this. We are currently adding the > edubase ref