Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Review of Solihull naptan data

Hi Ed Only one and that's one I surveyed Regards Brian On 8 February 2017 at 15:44, Ed Loach wrote: > How many of those also have physically_present=no (so definitely a bus > stop, but no pole) as described here: > >

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Review of Solihull naptan data

How many of those also have physically_present=no (so definitely a bus stop, but no pole) as described here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NaPTAN/Surveying_and_Merging_NaPTAN_and_OSM_data#physically_present ? Ed From: Brian Prangle [mailto:br...@mappa-mercia.org] Sent: 08

[Talk-gb-westmidlands] Review of Solihull naptan data

Hi everyone I've found 39 CUS stops that are marked with highway=bus_stop. Over 60% were edited by reliable mappers so I'd trust our data mostly I think it will be where CUS stops have been upgraded by TfWM sticking a pole in the ground. I think we can live with any anomalies unti an automated

[Talk-gb-westmidlands] TfWM naptan data cleanup

Hi everyone This week's work has resulted in the following: 1.Removed all bus stop nodes from highways to side of way. These were mainly in NW of the region. I might not have got the correct side in every case, but this will be corrected by a later automated edit 2.TfWM's location data is not