Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] [Talk-transit] NaPTAN and the new PT tagging schema

2009-06-26 Thread Roger Slevin
I agree with Peter's view on "Custom and Practice" (CUS) stops - they exist ... but they are not marked in the same way as MKD stops are marked. But they are real as far as the user is concerned! Roger -Original Message- From: talk-transit-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-transit-

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] [Talk-transit] NaPTAN and the new PT tagging schema

2009-06-26 Thread Peter Miller
Your suggestions below make a lot of sense. I would however very much encourage you to include customary stops because they do indeed 'exist' even though there is no physical pole. Consider a road that doesn't have a name plate but when you people who live on the street what it is called t

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] [Talk-transit] NaPTAN and the new PT tagging schema

2009-06-26 Thread Thomas Wood
2009/6/24 Peter Miller : > > On 24 Jun 2009, at 18:20, Thomas Wood wrote: > >> 2009/6/24 Peter Miller : >>> >>> Can I suggest that we treat this import and any final tagging as a >>> separate >>> issue on separate timeline from the NaPTAN import just so long as no >>> important information in the N