Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] TfWM NaPTAN refresh

On 15 February 2017 at 23:10, Brian Prangle wrote: > I don't understand what there is to sort out. We don't want to delete the > node and its naptan data just the bus_stop tag which the naptan:Status=DEL > indicates. If we delete the node entirely it's difficult to recover if

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] TfWM NaPTAN refresh

Hi Matthijs I don't understand what there is to sort out. We don't want to delete the node and its naptan data just the bus_stop tag which the naptan:Status=DEL indicates. If we delete the node entirely it's difficult to recover if there any errors in the status and we actually survey one of

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] TfWM NaPTAN refresh

On 15 February 2017 at 17:58, Brian Prangle wrote: > I've just removed the highway=bus_stop tag from any NaPTAN node that after > yesterdays' refresh carried the tag naptan:Status=DEL. There were 237 cases. > The nodes are still there, just not rendered so if there are any

[Talk-gb-westmidlands] TfWM NaPTAN refresh

I've just removed the highway=bus_stop tag from any NaPTAN node that after yesterdays' refresh carried the tag naptan:Status=DEL. There were 237 cases. The nodes are still there, just not rendered so if there are any errors in TfWM's NaPTAN data, a quick adding of a bus_stop tag is all that's

[Talk-gb-westmidlands] TfWM update of NapTAN data

Hi everyone Yesterday afternoon we updated existing OSM NapTAN nodes in the West Midlands Combined Authority area as per the plan documented in the wiki. We used a specific TfWM user account and hashtagged the changeset #tfwmnaptanrefresh Basically we added/updated: highway=bus_stop to all