-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
I don't really have too strong an opinion on this. If I were doing it
from scratch, I'd prefer to leave out the Barony of etc., since as
John points out, it /should/ be deducable from the object.
However, we have had County in county names
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Brian,
I'm not 100% sure what you're asking here. Are you asking about how
the objects should be named in OSM? Or are you looking for a way to
display a map with guaranteed to have a Barony of prefix?
If it's the later, I could update the
Hi all
There are a number of unmarked but documented grave sites where children we
buried in the last century and in the earlier part of this century in my area.
We would like to include them on OSM but I’d like advice on how these should be
marked as they are not officially on consecrated
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Conor,
On 07/12/14 10:40, Conor Jones wrote:
+ County Donegal: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/283732 +
County Donegal: http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4085165
(seems to be 2 for each county?)
Those 2 relations have different
I've been tagging these too. I generally tag them as they are written in
the gsgs sheets, so if they are called a burial ground I tag as
historic=burial_ground and if the sheet calls out the type I add something
along the lines of burial_ground=children etc.
I adjust the above based on what the
Once you go off the coast a lot of the rules go out the window, so to
speak.
I know Cormac had a lot of trouble off the coast of Galway but got it
worked out in the end. He tried explaining it to me as I wanted to do a
video on coastline stuff but to be honest I was lost.
If he's on this list he
