subject:"\[OSM\-talk\-ie\] Ringforts"

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Ringforts

2017-03-10 Thread Mark Tully

According to the wiki ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Afortification_type), the recommended tagging for ring forts is: - historic = archaeological_site - site_type

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Ringforts

2017-03-09 Thread Rory McCann

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi. I've been mapping ringforts myself. However I've been using a tagging suggested by brianh, and I've mapped about 1,600 of them. historic=earthworks earthworks=rath You can sorta see here that I've bee working through Clare & Kerry:

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Ringforts

2017-03-08 Thread Brian Tuffy

Hi Keith, There were some already mapped in my area and so I started mapping some myself here, http://histosm.org/#11/-9.1571/53.827/0/ HistOSM gives a clearer picture of these kinds of things, the more historical things get, the less relevant they are for OSM though. I wonder is it possible to

[OSM-talk-ie] Ringforts

2017-03-08 Thread Keith

Helo, Just wondering if there is any common tags used to tag ringforts/rath/lios's etc., and if many have been mapped to date ? Keith ___ Talk-ie mailing list Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie