Hi Arun,

This is an amazing idea. I am not sure how but would be happy to contribute. 
Part of my PhD deals with geo-spatial data infra in India. 


Thanks.

Best,
Amish

> On Jan 31, 2020, at 3:35 AM, talk-in-requ...@openstreetmap.org wrote:
> 
> Send Talk-in mailing list submissions to
>       talk-in@openstreetmap.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       talk-in-requ...@openstreetmap.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       talk-in-ow...@openstreetmap.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Talk-in digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: OSM India Chapter (Arun Ganesh)
>   2. Re: OSM India Chapter (satyakam goswami)
>   3. Re: OSM India Chapter (Arun Ganesh)
>   4. Re: OSM India Chapter (Arun Ganesh)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 14:28:56 -0500
> From: Arun Ganesh <arun.plane...@gmail.com>
> To: OpenStreetMap in India <talk-in@openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Talk-in] OSM India Chapter
> Message-ID:
>       <CA+GKQr1vgCmiAsiPkSTpyJK=pnyhh3bf7hovdnodtarp30u...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 11:52 PM Pradeep Mohandas <
> pradeep.mohan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hello all,
>> 
>> In the Virtual Mappy Hours held yesterday, the OSM Chair Allan Mustard had
>> suggested that we go ahead with the formation of an Indian chapter and
>> officially affiliate with the OSM Foundation. This enables us to use the
>> OSM Trademark officially.
>> 
>> I thought I would start the thread on this list for people interested in
>> this effort.
>> 
> I know that there is an active Telegram group going on, but I think putting
>> things on the mailing list will help archive the effort and discussion that
>> goes into formation of a Chapter. For future historians of the
>> movement,this would be something akin to the Constituent Assembly
>> discussions are to India today.
>> 
>> On the chat yesterday, I had cautioned that India has had previous bitter
>> experiences with running organisations wherein a Foundation manages the
>> organisations or groups in various countries. We are seeing the effect of
>> that in the Wikimedia movement in India. Naveen, also on this group, has
>> first-hand experience with this as he was involved in the formation of the
>> Wikimedia India Chapter.
>> 
>> I hope that such previous experiences of the members here will help us
>> avoid the pitfalls and help to form a much more stronger OSM India Chapter.
>> In India, the experience has been that the introduction of an organisation
>> leads to dis-organisation of the community. I hope we can stay in this
>> together and for the long haul.
>> 
>> 
> This is a welcome step and i support the setting up of a chapter as a
> longtime contributor to the project.  We've organically grown as a hobby
> community very nicely and with bigger players like corporates and the
> government starting to use the data, it feels like having a legal
> organization can enable much more to happen.
> 
> Having also seen constant mailing list drama with the Wikimedia India
> chapter, it would definitely be wise to learn from the chapter forming
> experiences of other open communities in India.
> 
> Lets list a few such successful and thriving chapters that folks are aware
> of and that might help think of the next steps and folks to rope in for
> guidance.
> 
> Even more importantly, if anyone feels this is not a good idea, this is the
> time to speak up and share their concerns.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/attachments/20200130/2040ac46/attachment-0001.htm>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 07:28:55 +0530
> From: satyakam goswami <satyaa...@gmail.com>
> To: OpenStreetMap in India <talk-in@openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Talk-in] OSM India Chapter
> Message-ID:
>       <CALre89k7eFGd7T98HbxfHzoh=eqar4egizf_i4mux-ixrp1...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
>> 
>> On the chat yesterday, I had cautioned that India has had previous bitter
>> experiences with running organisations wherein a Foundation manages the
>> organisations or groups in various countries. We are seeing the effect of
>> that in the Wikimedia movement in India. Naveen, also on this group, has
>> first-hand experience with this as he was involved in the formation of the
>> Wikimedia India Chapter.
>> 
>> I hope that such previous experiences of the members here will help us
>> avoid the pitfalls and help to form a much more stronger OSM India Chapter.
>> In India, the experience has been that the introduction of an organisation
>> leads to dis-organisation of the community. I hope we can stay in this
>> together and for the long haul.
>> 
> 
> Hi Pradeep,
> 
> I hear and understand the travails we too have been through same
> experiences , i have seen many more than just the two examples you cited
> 
> its been my fortune to have seen under various projects like Indlinux.org
> then Linux users group of Delhi form societies then die , as recent as few
> days back there was a little murmor in the ILUGD community as to the
> paradox we have to live with on one side we love anarchy but the systems
> around us expect us to have a form this is felt more when we want to
> organize events, this we faced in with the Python community as well in the
> last 11 years we have closed three societies ourselves just for the same
> reasons , ultimately we came up with a model in which the community is
> seperated from the seretarial work which has to get done in order to with
> Sponsors and Vendors .
> 
> now we have a model where PyCon India [1] is organized on rotation from
> various users groups from around country,these users groups aka chapters
> have no formal body they exist on Mailing lists and meetup groups [2] they
> first show case the strenght in organizing the event of this magnitude then
> we rally behind them to make it happen, its the local organizing community
> which drives and decides how they want to spend the money for an event ,
> there are no gatekeepers at the end of the event all the financials are
> made public after every event.
> 
> [1] https://in.pycon.org/2019/
> [2] http://python.org.in/
> 
> thanks,
> -Satya
> Satyakam.dev | afrost.org | fossevents.in <http://www.fossevents.in>
> ** For all official purposes use my name as Satyakam Goswami **
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/attachments/20200131/d63ad621/attachment-0001.htm>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 22:32:36 -0500
> From: Arun Ganesh <arun.plane...@gmail.com>
> To: OpenStreetMap in India <talk-in@openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Talk-in] OSM India Chapter
> Message-ID:
>       <ca+gkqr1hma6p2jsnjkeh0tj1ow3+yh4evzaagh9+7_ctzlu...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> now we have a model where PyCon India [1] is organized on rotation from
>> various users groups from around country,these users groups aka chapters
>> have no formal body they exist on Mailing lists and meetup groups [2] they
>> first show case the strenght in organizing the event of this magnitude then
>> we rally behind them to make it happen, its the local organizing community
>> which drives and decides how they want to spend the money for an event ,
>> there are no gatekeepers at the end of the event all the financials are
>> made public after every event.
>> 
>> 
> Quite impressive, this also encourages smaller local groups to be active
> rather than having a powerful central body which inevitably tends to become
> distanced from those on the ground.
> 
> Does every conference need to find a new supporting institution to handle
> financials? Thats a part that can burn out volunteers trying to organize
> events/conferences and making sure the accounting is taken care of.
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/attachments/20200130/18030079/attachment-0001.htm>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 22:35:29 -0500
> From: Arun Ganesh <arun.plane...@gmail.com>
> To: OpenStreetMap in India <talk-in@openstreetmap.org>
> Subject: Re: [Talk-in] OSM India Chapter
> Message-ID:
>       <CA+GKQr3KNj1R7=wdyab31irzqcwwozfrvbvptuvzgudghw3...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 10:32 PM Arun Ganesh <arun.plane...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> now we have a model where PyCon India [1] is organized on rotation from
>>> various users groups from around country,these users groups aka chapters
>>> have no formal body they exist on Mailing lists and meetup groups [2] they
>>> first show case the strenght in organizing the event of this magnitude then
>>> we rally behind them to make it happen, its the local organizing community
>>> which drives and decides how they want to spend the money for an event ,
>>> there are no gatekeepers at the end of the event all the financials are
>>> made public after every event.
>>> 
>>> 
>> Quite impressive, this also encourages smaller local groups to be active
>> rather than having a powerful central body which inevitably tends to become
>> distanced from those on the ground.
>> 
>> Does every conference need to find a new supporting institution to handle
>> financials? Thats a part that can burn out volunteers trying to organize
>> events/conferences and making sure the accounting is taken care of.
>> 
>> 
>> 
> Coming back to the original reasons for an OSM chapter to be able to
> officially use the OSM trademark, do the python user groups not have this
> issue?
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-in/attachments/20200130/7a31815e/attachment.htm>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-in mailing list
> Talk-in@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of Talk-in Digest, Vol 137, Issue 10
> ****************************************


_______________________________________________
Talk-in mailing list
Talk-in@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in

Reply via email to