Re: [Talk-in] Relation tags for archaeological sites

2013-04-13 Thread doc.ane...@gmail.com
Oh so, style = hoysala is valid? Cool... Coz there are some well hidden temples of that era with such intricate carvings.. I'd want to put all the locations on osm and tag them ___ Talk-in mailing list Talk-in@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-in] Relation tags for archaeological sites

2013-04-13 Thread paramvir00
Excellent idea Doc Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.

Re: [Talk-in] Relation tags for archaeological sites

2013-04-13 Thread I Chengappa
*Sent: *Saturday, 13 April 2013 1:34 PM *To: *OpenStreetMap in India *Reply To: *OpenStreetMap in India *Subject: *Re: [Talk-in] Relation tags for archaeological sites Oh so, style = hoysala is valid? Cool... Coz there are some well hidden temples of that era with such intricate carvings.. I'd

Re: [Talk-in] Relation tags for archaeological sites

2013-04-13 Thread doc.ane...@gmail.com
I'm talking about the documented ones, built by hoysala kings... Wikipedia has a list with references... I won't use it unless it's convincing Sent from my HTC ___ Talk-in mailing list Talk-in@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-in] Relation tags for archaeological sites

2013-04-13 Thread I Chengappa
I didn't mean research on the temples, I meant research to make sure they are tagged with the right key in OSM! On 13 April 2013 10:10, doc.ane...@gmail.com doc.ane...@gmail.com wrote: I'm talking about the documented ones, built by hoysala kings... Wikipedia has a list with references... I

Re: [Talk-in] Relation tags for archaeological sites

2013-04-13 Thread doc.ane...@gmail.com
Oh ok.. got it... That was what I was asking to begin with Sent from my HTC ___ Talk-in mailing list Talk-in@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-in

Re: [Talk-in] Relation tags for archaeological sites

2013-04-13 Thread Arun Ganesh
Just looked up tag info. building:style looks relevant. http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/building%3Astyle On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 2:40 PM, doc.ane...@gmail.com doc.ane...@gmail.comwrote: I'm talking about the documented ones, built by hoysala kings... Wikipedia has a list with

Re: [Talk-in] Relation tags for archaeological sites

2013-04-13 Thread Arun Ganesh
Additionally, you could also use start_datehttp://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/start_date#values to record the year of construction which can help make an interesting time series visualization. Doc, can you create a page on the wiki for this, I'm sure there will be a lot of people outside OSM,

Re: [Talk-in] Relation tags for archaeological sites

2013-04-13 Thread Aneesh T
eg... building:style = hoysala?? and start_date = 1120 AD ?? On 14 April 2013 08:48, Arun Ganesh arun.plane...@gmail.com wrote: Additionally, you could also use start_datehttp://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/start_date#values to record the year of construction which can help make an

Re: [Talk-in] Relation tags for archaeological sites

2013-04-12 Thread I Chengappa
Why would you want to do this? I understand that there is a logical relation between these temples, but I can't see that there is any mapping relation that is relevant to OSM and its renderers. Whereas for instance in a multipolygon with holes (islands in a lake) there is a clear relation. On 11

Re: [Talk-in] Relation tags for archaeological sites

2013-04-12 Thread Arun Ganesh
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 7:40 AM, doc.ane...@gmail.com doc.ane...@gmail.comwrote: If there's a relation linking all of them.. a map displaying all such monuments can be made easily... That's it All that is required is that the node or polygon representing the temples have tags that allow it

[Talk-in] Relation tags for archaeological sites

2013-04-10 Thread doc.ane...@gmail.com
I'm planning on mapping all the significant hoysala temples in Karnataka... Is there a way to group them together using relations? If yes, can someone tell me what tags to use? ___ Talk-in mailing list Talk-in@openstreetmap.org