[Talk-hr] Google Map Maker vs. OpenStreetMap

2014-02-19 Per discussione hbogner
Za one koji neprate fb, stavljeno je tamo zbog veće publike: Danas čitam svašta po netu i naletim na članak koji kaže:Google Map Maker od danas dostupan u Hrvatskoj Super, napokon je i Hrvatska na Google Map Maker, jedna od zadnjih u regiji, ali tu je. Sve je to super samo što Google kasni

Re: [talk-ph] multiple multipolygons for Pampanga River

2014-02-19 Per discussione Pierre Béland
Ronny, It is not necessary fo merge the two relations, Each of these riverbank polygons must be a closed polygon. See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Driverbank For the relation 2411084, you must replaced the Tag natural=water to waterway=riverbank. North of Obrero the

Re: [talk-ph] multiple multipolygons for Pampanga River

2014-02-19 Per discussione Ronny Ager-Wick
Thanks for the clarification, Pierre. Actually, I tagged the relation both with natural=water, water=river and waterway=riverbank as advised in the wiki (see New Tagging) I assume this is the recommended way to do it? As for Obrero, I haven't been that far north yet :) I only traced it up to

Re: [talk-ph] multiple multipolygons for Pampanga River

2014-02-19 Per discussione Pierre Béland
Hi  Ronny, The tagging list would be the best place to have information about the best tag to use. Not everyone agrees to follow such votes for tagging where only a few people participated.   Pierre De : Ronny Ager-Wick ro...@ager-wick.com À : Pierre

Re: [talk-ph] multiple multipolygons for Pampanga River

2014-02-19 Per discussione Eugene Alvin Villar
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Ronny Ager-Wick ro...@ager-wick.comwrote: Thanks for the clarification, Pierre. Actually, I tagged the relation both with natural=water, water=river and waterway=riverbank as advised in the wiki (see New Tagging) I assume this is the recommended way to do it?

[OSM-talk-nl] Donderdag mappersbabbel Amsterdam

2014-02-19 Per discussione Floris Looijesteijn
Hallo! Beetje late aankondiging maar morgen (donderdag de 20e) is er weer een Mappersbabbel in Amsterdam. Aanmelding via meetup.com of anders hier wordt op prijs gesteld zodat we een goeie tafel kunnen kiezen. http://www.meetup.com/AmsGeoDrinks/events/165401792/ Vaste tijd en plaats: 19:00 bij

Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Donderdag mappersbabbel Amsterdam

2014-02-19 Per discussione Sebastiaan Couwenberg
Beetje late aankondiging maar morgen (donderdag de 20e) is er weer een Mappersbabbel in Amsterdam. [...] Vaste tijd en plaats: 19:00 bij Kaptein Zeppo's aan het 'Gebed Zonder End' in het centrum van Amsterdam. Ik ben in principe van de partij, maar ik ga 19:00 niet halen vrees ik. Gaat

Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Donderdag mappersbabbel Amsterdam

2014-02-19 Per discussione Steven M. Ottens
Ha Floris, Gezellig, ik ben er rond een uurtje of acht steven Floris Looijesteijn schreef op 2/19/2014 10:50 AM: Hallo! Beetje late aankondiging maar morgen (donderdag de 20e) is er weer een Mappersbabbel in Amsterdam. Aanmelding via meetup.com http://meetup.com of anders hier wordt op

Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Donderdag mappersbabbel Amsterdam

2014-02-19 Per discussione Gertjan Idema
Ik ben helaas verhinderd. Prettige avond morgen. Gertjan On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 10:50 +0100, Floris Looijesteijn wrote: Hallo! Beetje late aankondiging maar morgen (donderdag de 20e) is er weer een Mappersbabbel in Amsterdam. Aanmelding via meetup.com of anders hier wordt op prijs

Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Donderdag mappersbabbel Amsterdam

2014-02-19 Per discussione Floris Looijesteijn
zaterdag 15 maart gaat wat mij betreft ook nog door. we zullen morgen even over een locatie nadenken. en het dan wat eerder aankondigen :) groet, floris 2014-02-19 11:03 GMT+01:00 Sebastiaan Couwenberg sebas...@xs4all.nl: Beetje late aankondiging maar morgen (donderdag de 20e) is er weer

Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Donderdag mappersbabbel Amsterdam

2014-02-19 Per discussione Henk Hoff
Ik zal er ook pas tegen 8 uur zijn is mijn verwachting. Gr, Henk Van: Steven M. Ottens [mailto:ste...@minst.net] Verzonden: woensdag 19 februari 2014 11:24 Aan: talk-nl@openstreetmap.org Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk-nl] Donderdag mappersbabbel Amsterdam Ha Floris, Gezellig, ik ben er

Re: [talk-au] Motorway edits in NSW / Vic

2014-02-19 Per discussione Mark Pulley
On 19 Feb 2014, at 6:15 pm, Mark Pulley mrpul...@lizzy.com.au wrote: Quoting Jason Ward jasonjwa...@gmail.com: Sorry for the double post / email, This [1] looks like the reversion has been done for AU. If a mrpulley is on the talk-au list could you update Serge and talk-au? [1]:

[Talk-br] Criar Layers novos

2014-02-19 Per discussione Clément Vialle
Boa tarde a todos, Professor de urbanismo, gostaria de envolver meus alunos no processo de cadastramento de informações ligadas a urbanismo. Pelo visto, OSM tem layers predefinidos (parão, rede de ciclovias,..). Seria interessante ter outros layers, como: - Uso do solo - Gabaritos (alturas dos

Re: [Talk-br] Criar Layers novos

2014-02-19 Per discussione John Packer
Olá Clement, Dê uma olhada no ITO Maps http://www.itoworld.com/map/main É uma empresa que mostra o OSM com outros tipos de camadas. Para camadas personalizadas, ainda não ouvi falar como fazer de uma forma que não envolva programação. Em 19 de fevereiro de 2014 15:09, Clément Vialle

Re: [Talk-br] Criar Layers novos

2014-02-19 Per discussione Marcelo Pereira
Até onde eu sei : - O OSM não tem layers, é só uma base de dados geográficos, acessível via API, entre outras formas. - O que aparece no site do OSM e tb no ITO, são diferentes maneiras de renderizar o mapa, usando CSS, se n me engano. - Se vc pretende renderizar um mapa de forma particular, acho

Re: [Talk-br] Criar Layers novos

2014-02-19 Per discussione Fernando Trebien
Olá Clément, Já passei por algumas informações que parecem não se adequar ao OSM, mas a principal vantagem do OSM é que podemos criar novas tags para representar informação nova. O ideal é que se discuta isso num nível mundial pra ver se a mesma necessidade existe em outro lugar e se tem como

Re: [Talk-br] Criar Layers novos

2014-02-19 Per discussione Fernando Trebien
*guia de importação 2014-02-19 16:06 GMT-03:00 Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com: Olá Clément, Já passei por algumas informações que parecem não se adequar ao OSM, mas a principal vantagem do OSM é que podemos criar novas tags para representar informação nova. O ideal é que se

Re: [Talk-br] Postos de salva-vidas

2014-02-19 Per discussione Flavio Bello Fialho
amenity=lifeguard parece ser adequado, por hora. Se a comunidade internacional decidir por outra coisa, fica fácil mudar. Não interessa se é renderizado ou não. Isso é uma questão a ser trabalhada no renderizador. Em 18/02/2014 10:43, Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com escreveu: Joguei

Re: [Talk-br] Postos de salva-vidas

2014-02-19 Per discussione Fernando Trebien
Amenity=lifeguard não está em nenhuma proposta, as demais tags mencionadas já estão. Eu acho que emergency_service=lifeguard seria a melhor por ora. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Flavio Bello Fialho bello.fla...@gmail.com wrote: amenity=lifeguard parece ser adequado, por hora. Se a comunidade

Re: [Talk-br] Postos de salva-vidas

2014-02-19 Per discussione Bráulio
Concordo que emergency_service seja melhor. E também não acho uma boa jogar mais uma coisa dentro de amenity. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com wrote: Amenity=lifeguard não está em nenhuma proposta, as demais tags mencionadas já estão. Eu acho que

Re: [Talk-br] Postos de salva-vidas

2014-02-19 Per discussione Arlindo Pereira
+1 []s On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Bráulio brauliobeze...@gmail.com wrote: Concordo que emergency_service seja melhor. E também não acho uma boa jogar mais uma coisa dentro de amenity. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [Talk-br] Postos de salva-vidas

2014-02-19 Per discussione Flavio Bello Fialho
Ok. Concordo com emergency_service=lifeguard. O importante é padronizar. Em 19/02/2014 18:38, Arlindo Pereira openstreet...@arlindopereira.com escreveu: +1 []s On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Bráulio brauliobeze...@gmail.com wrote: Concordo que emergency_service seja melhor. E também não

Re: [Talk-br] Postos de salva-vidas

2014-02-19 Per discussione Fernando Trebien
Anotei: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Brazil/Refer%C3%AAncia#Casos_espec.C3.ADficos On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Flavio Bello Fialho bello.fla...@gmail.com wrote: Ok. Concordo com emergency_service=lifeguard. O importante é padronizar. Em 19/02/2014 18:38, Arlindo Pereira

Re: [Talk-de] [Caution: Message contains Redirect URL content] Re: Datenschutz bei Geodaten?

2014-02-19 Per discussione Elstermann, Mike
Hat mir keine Ruhe gelassen ;-) https://www.datenschutzzentrum.de/geodaten/studie-2008-datenschutzrechtliche-rahmenbedingungen-bereitstellung-geodaten.pdf Seite 10 ff. Wir hatten 2010 zum Geofachtag in Dessau (http://www.netzwerk-gis.de/index.php?article_id=78) einen Vortrag dazu

Re: [Talk-de] [Caution: Message contains Redirect URL content] Re: Datenschutz bei Geodaten?

2014-02-19 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
Am 19/feb/2014 um 13:31 schrieb Elstermann, Mike mike.elsterm...@itc-halle.de: Am 18. Februar 2014 16:03 schrieb Elstermann, Mike mike.elsterm...@itc-halle.de: Hier die Kernaussagen: 1. Karten mit einem Maßstab kleiner als 1 : 5 000; OSM ist 1:1 (oder je nach Betrachtungsweise auch

Re: [Talk-de] Datenschutz bei Geodaten?

2014-02-19 Per discussione Steffen Wolf
Elstermann, Mike schrieb: ich schreib mal ein paar erklaerende Worte direkt an den Anfang des Threads: Hier die Kernaussagen: Da fehlt noch der Einleitungssatz dazu: | Im Hinblick auf die nur geringe Wahrscheinlichkeit und Intensitaet von | moeglichen Persoenlichkeitsverletzungen ist nach der

Re: [Talk-de] Datenschutz bei Geodaten?

2014-02-19 Per discussione Steffen Wolf
Hi Martin Koppenhoefer, Am 18. Februar 2014 16:03 schrieb Elstermann, Mike und zitiert dabei aus dem Behoerdenleitfaden, der wiederum Empfehlungen vom 3. Geofortschrittsbericht wiedergibt, die auf die Arbeiten der Task Force GeoBusiness Datenschutz ger GIW-Kommission zurueckgehen: oder 4.

[Talk-de] Jetzt RadioOSM Live

2014-02-19 Per discussione mazdermind
Hallo liebe OpenStreetMapper, in kürze sendet RadioOSM wieder Live. Ihr könnt uns auf http://ift.tt/Zn8aRB Live hören und mit uns und anderen Hörern im Chat sprechen: irc://irc.freenode.net/#Radio-OSM (Webchat: http://ift.tt/17njx3P) Alle weiteren Infos sowie alle alten Folgen findet ihr auf

Re: [Talk-de] Datenschutz bei Geodaten?

2014-02-19 Per discussione Bernd Wurst
Hallo. Am 19.02.2014 19:50, schrieb Steffen Wolf: Und ich bin sowieso immer verwirrt, was nun ein kleinerer Massstab ist und was ein groesserer. Na dann. Ich seh zwei offensichtliche Lesarten, die sich aber nicht widersprechen: - kleinerer Maßstab = Die dargestellten Elemente sind kleiner =

Re: [Talk-de] Datenschutz bei Geodaten?

2014-02-19 Per discussione Elstermann, Mike
Grundwissen aus Klasse 6 (in der ehem. DDR: Klasse 5 ;-) Aber trotzdem ein ewiges Verständnisproblem, so erklärt es die Geographie der Uni in Halle (offensichtlich ist es nötig): http://mars.geographie.uni-halle.de/geovlexcms/book/export/html/218 mikeE. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von:

Re: [Talk-de] Datenschutz bei Geodaten?

2014-02-19 Per discussione Florian Lohoff
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 07:40:32AM +, Elstermann, Mike wrote: Grundwissen aus Klasse 6 (in der ehem. DDR: Klasse 5 ;-) Aber trotzdem ein ewiges Verständnisproblem, so erklärt es die Geographie der Uni in Halle (offensichtlich ist es nötig):

Re: [Talk-it] Wikipedia-tag-in-OSM: da OSM a Wikipedia (versione beta)

2014-02-19 Per discussione Andrea De Gradi
Ti prego di non prendermi come uno che non gli va mai bene niente, sono contento del lavoro che stai facendo ed è già ad un ottimo punto, voglio solo dare dei suggerimenti su come migliorarlo, i suggerimenti li do da non esperto programmatore quindi molte volte non conosco la fattibilità di quello

Re: [Talk-it] Wikipedia-tag-in-OSM: da OSM a Wikipedia (versione beta)

2014-02-19 Per discussione Andrea De Gradi
Un'altra cosa ancora che ho trovato è che se scelgo di riposizionare il marker il template coord che mi viene proposto non conta del riposizionamento del marker ma viene compilato con le coordinate iniziali cioè quelle che mi compaiono appena clicco sul simbolo con la W. Il giorno 19 febbraio

[Talk-it] mapbox marker nella posizione giusta solo al massimo zoom

2014-02-19 Per discussione Zardetto Carlo
Salve ho un problema e me ne sono accorto solo ora e volevo sapere se qualcuno mi può dare una mano. Sto usando le mapbox.js versione 1.4 per la gestione delle OSM. Carico la mappa con uno zoom 14. var map = L.mapbox.map('map', 'xxx.map-h6zjbw6j').setView([xx.xxx,y.yyy], 14); var

Re: [Talk-it] TMap

2014-02-19 Per discussione Daniele Forsi
Il 18 febbraio 2014 07:58, Stefano Fraccaro ha scritto: vi informo che ho da poco rilasciato un software da linea di comando per renderizzare mappe statiche. Se avete consigli e critiche... ;-) http://www.montellug.it/wiki/index.php?title=TMap consigli: metti almeno una immagine di una

Re: [Talk-it] mapbox marker nella posizione giusta solo al massimo zoom

2014-02-19 Per discussione sabas88
Il giorno 19 febbraio 2014 12:10, Zardetto Carlo ca...@artmediastudio.comha scritto: Salve ho un problema e me ne sono accorto solo ora e volevo sapere se qualcuno mi può dare una mano. Sto usando le mapbox.js versione 1.4 per la gestione delle OSM. Carico la mappa con uno zoom 14. var

Re: [Talk-it] mapbox marker nella posizione giusta solo al massimozoom

2014-02-19 Per discussione Zardetto Carlo
Grazie mille ! Ho messo quella di default , affronterò il problema più avanti. Grazie ancora mi hai salvato From: sabas88 Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 1:01 PM To: openstreetmap list - italiano Subject: Re: [Talk-it] mapbox marker nella posizione giusta solo al massimozoom Il giorno 19

Re: [Talk-it] Wikipedia-tag-in-OSM: da OSM a Wikipedia (versione beta)

2014-02-19 Per discussione Daniele Forsi
Cristian, a proposito dei popup sui marker: su quello blu il fumetto appare spostato (vedi ritaglio allegato preso da Chrome, ma è uguale in Firefox) quindi viene il dubbio di quali sono le coordinate calcolate per il centroide, per evitar(mi) questo dubbio potresti visualizzare le coordinate in

Re: [Talk-it] Wikipedia-tag-in-OSM: da OSM a Wikipedia (versione beta)

2014-02-19 Per discussione Cristian Consonni
Il 19 febbraio 2014 11:38, Andrea De Gradi dega...@gmail.com ha scritto: Ti prego di non prendermi come uno che non gli va mai bene niente, sono contento del lavoro che stai facendo ed è già ad un ottimo punto, voglio solo dare dei suggerimenti su come migliorarlo, i suggerimenti li do da non

Re: [Talk-it] Wikipedia-tag-in-OSM: da OSM a Wikipedia (versione beta)

2014-02-19 Per discussione Cristian Consonni
Il 19 febbraio 2014 14:33, Daniele Forsi dfo...@gmail.com ha scritto: a proposito dei popup sui marker: su quello blu il fumetto appare spostato (vedi ritaglio allegato preso da Chrome, ma è uguale in Firefox) quindi viene il dubbio di quali sono le coordinate calcolate per il centroide, per

Re: [Talk-it] Wikipedia-tag-in-OSM: da OSM a Wikipedia (versione beta)

2014-02-19 Per discussione Cascafico Giovanni
corbezzoli! piazza unità d'italia (ts) ha dei problemi MediaWiki ha restitutito un errore: Page Piazza_Unit%C3%A0_d%27Italia does not exist on it.wikipedia Contatta gli sviluppatori e mandagli qualche dettaglio a proposito di questo errore. forse l'apostrofo? Il giorno 19 febbraio 2014 16:50,

Re: [Talk-it] R: R: R: ruolo admin_centre assente per molte amministrazioni

2014-02-19 Per discussione Fabrizio Carrai
Soltanto *4* comuni per completare il lavoro #ComuneRelation IDPlace1Ponza40922http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/40922http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/ 2Barano d'Ischia40705 http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/40705http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/ 3Carinola41141

Re: [Talk-se] Gatubilder till OSM - Mapillary 3 OpenStreetMap

2014-02-19 Per discussione Jan Erik Solem
Hej igen Vi hade ett mysigt litet möte igår. Tack Karl för att du fixade. Anders, ny site kom upp idag med datum då bilden togs under varje bild. Erik, efter lite diskussion kom vi fram till att bilderna som delas ut bör vara CC-BY och inte ODbL. Vi hade också idén att dumpa metadata (GeoJSON?)

Re: [Talk-ee] Pööramispiirangute veateated

2014-02-19 Per discussione Mihkel Rämmel
Soovitan suhtuda kergelt kriitilise meelega kõigisse vigadesse, mida igasugused valideerimistööriistad välja loobivad. * Esiteks uuenevad sildistamisreeglid kiiremini, kui selliste tööriistade reeglid järgi jõuavad. * Teiseks mõtlevad sellised tööriistad aegajalt andmekasutajate laiskusele mitte

[Talk-ca] Updating Langley and use of alt_name?

2014-02-19 Per discussione Daniel Friesen
I'm a little new to OSM, recently I found that neither of the city boundaries for the Langley area showed up in searches for Langley. The issue was that neither had any type of name entry with just Langley I added an alt_name=Langley to both of the boundaries myself:

Re: [Talk-ca] Updating Langley and use of alt_name?

2014-02-19 Per discussione Corey Burger
I would do both, as you might be looking for the exact location or the municipal border. Corey On Feb 19, 2014 3:10 AM, Daniel Friesen dan...@nadir-seen-fire.com wrote: I'm a little new to OSM, recently I found that neither of the city boundaries for the Langley area showed up in searches for

Re: [Talk-ca] Updating Langley and use of alt_name?

2014-02-19 Per discussione Pierre Béland
I see that both relations have the same classification admin_level=8. If these are simply to refer to alternate names, there should be only one relation with alternate names. Otherwise, if the City and the Township refer to different admin_levels, shoud the classification be revised ?  

Re: [Talk-ca] Updating Langley and use of alt_name?

2014-02-19 Per discussione Corey Burger
The naming might be confusing to non BC resident, as both the City and Township are both municipalities under the regional government, unlike other places where a township is the regional level. Corey On Feb 19, 2014 12:42 PM, Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr wrote: I see that both relations

[Talk-ca] Nouvelle licence de données ouvertes au Québec

2014-02-19 Per discussione Bruno Remy
Bonjour, Selon ce communiqué d'adoption d'une licence commune d’utilisation des données ouvertes http://t.co/bKOsO8n5ax Les villes de Québec, Montreal, Gatineau, Sherbrooke et le gouv. Provincial ont unis leur licences maison en une seule licence un peu plus génerique. #opendata

Re: [Talk-ca] Licence Gouvernement du Québec

2014-02-19 Per discussione Pierre Béland
Bruno, A première vue bonne nouvelle.  Mais avant de se réjouir, il faut s'assurer de voir quelle licence exactement est adoptée. Cette page indique qu'Il y a plusieurs licences possibles sour Creative Commons 4.0. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Je vais aux infos.   Pierre

Re: [Talk-ca] Licence Gouvernement du Québec

2014-02-19 Per discussione Pierre Béland
A suivre discussion sur Twitter et n'hésitez pas à commenter https://twitter.com/GouvOuvertQc/status/436234659597672449   Pierre De : Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr À : Bruno Remy bremy.qc...@gmail.com; talk-ca@openstreetmap.org talk-ca@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-ca] Licence Gouvernement du Québec

2014-02-19 Per discussione Pascal Robichaud
Pour avoir éte consulté par le Secrétariat du Conseil du Trésor, ils veulent mettre CC-BY de la Cc 4.0. Pascal Robichaud Le 2014-02-19 à 16:57, Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr a écrit : Bruno, A première vue bonne nouvelle. Mais avant de se réjouir, il faut s'assurer de voir quelle

Re: [Talk-ca] Licence Gouvernement du Québec

2014-02-19 Per discussione Pierre Béland
Si c'est CC-By, nous serions correct. voir résumé de licence http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ * Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format * Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material * for any purpose, even commercially.

Re: [Talk-cz] Lokální Taginfo

2014-02-19 Per discussione Marián Kyral
Jestli můžu mít dvě prosby: 1) Bylo by možné nastavit nějakou výchozí barvu pozadí? používám tmavý styl a v hlavičce mám černý text na tnavém pozadí (afaik by asi bylo dobré to nastavit na celou doménu) 2) Mapa mi nějak vytéká z rámu a zobrazení distribuce klíčů pak vychází někam do moře ;-)

Re: [Talk-cz] Adresy z RUIAN, 3. rekapitulace + ukázka

2014-02-19 Per discussione Petr Morávek [Xificurk]
Ahoj, Dne 18.2.2014 21:48, Petr Vejsada napsal(a): Přidávat, nahrazovat: addr:country=CZ Tohle bych vážně ještě zvážil - zatím taky nezazněl případ, kdy je ten tag potřeba. Jak jsem psal - osobně bych preferoval nemazat, nepřidávat. Pokud se ukáže, že to někde bezpodmínečně potřeba je, tak

Re: [Talk-cz] Adresy z RUIAN, 3. rekapitulace + ukázka

2014-02-19 Per discussione Petr Vejsada
Ahoj, Dne St 19. února 2014 18:07:40, Petr Morávek [Xificurk] napsal(a): Ahoj, Dne 18.2.2014 21:48, Petr Vejsada napsal(a): Přidávat, nahrazovat: addr:country=CZ Tohle bych vážně ještě zvážil - zatím taky nezazněl případ, kdy je ten tag potřeba. Jak jsem psal - osobně bych preferoval

Re: [Talk-cz] Lokální Taginfo

2014-02-19 Per discussione Petr Morávek [Xificurk]
Dne 18.2.2014 18:18, Petr Schönmann napsal(a): Ahoj, Michal zprovoznil lokální verzi tag info pro CZ http://taginfo.openstreetmap.cz Směle do vylepšování kvality mapy .) Díky Michale. Ahoj, koukám, že v hlavičce je Data from: 2014-02-13 21:49 UTC. Jak často se budou data aktualizovat?

Re: [Talk-it-southtyrol] Talk-it-southtyrol Digest, Vol 12, Issue 6

2014-02-19 Per discussione tomas
Ciao, ho dato un'occhiata veloce ai file per Salorno: noto che negli indirizzi viene proposto Staatsstrasse, ma la strada statale a Salorno si chiama Via Nazionale, Nationalstrasse Se posso vorrei dire anche la mia sull'ordine delle lingue, visto che è stato deciso di impostarlo in base

Re: [Talk-it-southtyrol] Talk-it-southtyrol Digest, Vol 12, Issue 6

2014-02-19 Per discussione immaterial
hi tomas, if i'm not wrong we agreed to write in english so everyone can unterstand. the other option would be everyone writing in his first/mother tongue. in catalonia place names are catalan only so no solution like yours can be found... and i think a map (even more if it is crowdsourced)

Re: [Talk-it-southtyrol] Talk-it-southtyrol Digest, Vol 12, Issue 6

2014-02-19 Per discussione immaterial
by the way... tomas: what would you propose to do with all those names which our dear friend ettore forgot to translate (i.e. invent)? maybe we should create an openstreetmap commission for the invention of new italian place names so that we can fully implement your überlegung (so

Re: [Talk-it-southtyrol] Talk-it-southtyrol Digest, Vol 12, Issue 6

2014-02-19 Per discussione Pietro d'Orio
Hi Tomas! I answer in english to permit to all to underdstand: Il 19/02/2014 15:50, tomas ha scritto: Ciao, ho dato un'occhiata veloce ai file per Salorno: noto che negli indirizzi viene proposto Staatsstrasse, ma la strada statale a Salorno si chiama Via Nazionale, Nationalstrasse I have

[OSM-talk-fr] Question sur le tag building=public

2014-02-19 Per discussione Romain MEHUT
Bonjour, Le tag amenity=public_building a été déprécié et remplacé par building=public http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dpublic_building Avant ce changement j'avais utilisé amenity=public_building pour identifier des services publics dont il n'existe pas (à ce jour) de tags

[OSM-talk-fr] évolution QA Insee

2014-02-19 Per discussione Stéphane Péneau
Hello, J'avais fait une capture du rendu QA le 16 décembre dernier, et je viens de renouveler l'opération. Je pense qu'entre temps, il y a une des modifications sur l'affichage des pastilles, mais ça donne tout de même un aperçu. Le 16/12/2013 : http://imageshack.com/a/img534/8611/dmyc.jpg

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Question sur le tag building=public

2014-02-19 Per discussione Pieren
2014-02-19 9:16 GMT+01:00 Romain MEHUT romain.me...@gmail.com: Des avis sur cette question? Je viens de poser la question sur la liste tagg...@openstreetmap.org Pieren ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Question sur le tag building=public

2014-02-19 Per discussione Pieren
2014-02-19 10:07 GMT+01:00 Pieren pier...@gmail.com: Je viens de poser la question sur la liste tagg...@openstreetmap.org Pour l'instant, une seule proposition comestible: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Depot Pieren ___ Talk-fr

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Question sur le tag building=public

2014-02-19 Per discussione Romain MEHUT
2014-02-19 11:41 GMT+01:00 Pieren pier...@gmail.com: 2014-02-19 10:07 GMT+01:00 Pieren pier...@gmail.com: Je viens de poser la question sur la liste tagg...@openstreetmap.org Pour l'instant, une seule proposition comestible: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Depot

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Question sur le tag building=public

2014-02-19 Per discussione Jean-Marc Liotier
On 19/02/2014 11:55, Romain MEHUT wrote: C'est un lieu où se trouve notamment le service des espaces verts où les agents municipaux préparent les plantations, font du compost... Chez moi, à Courbevoie, ce lieu est nommé serres municipales et je l'ai donc étiqueté landuse=plant_nursery Pour

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Question sur le tag building=public

2014-02-19 Per discussione Romain MEHUT
Le 19 février 2014 12:13, Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org a écrit : On 19/02/2014 11:55, Romain MEHUT wrote: C'est un lieu où se trouve notamment le service des espaces verts où les agents municipaux préparent les plantations, font du compost... Chez moi, à Courbevoie, ce lieu est nommé

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [OpenAquiMap] Amenity Editor

2014-02-19 Per discussione Frédéric Rodrigo
Bonjour, Dernière mise à jour de Amenity Editor prévu dans le cadre OpenAquiMap : l'édition des tags de polygones. http://ae.openstreetmap.fr/ Comme il me reste un peu de temps je vais me pencher sur les deux points que j'ai laissé en arrière, l’édition d’objet existant avec les preset et

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] [OpenAquiMap] Amenity Editor

2014-02-19 Per discussione Nicolas Dumoulin
Le mercredi 19 février 2014 14:29:11 Frédéric Rodrigo a écrit : Bonjour, Dernière mise à jour de Amenity Editor prévu dans le cadre OpenAquiMap : l'édition des tags de polygones. http://ae.openstreetmap.fr/ Comme il me reste un peu de temps je vais me pencher sur les deux points que

[OSM-talk-fr] Fwd: [LEGIFRANCE] JORF No 0043 DU 20 FEVRIER 2014

2014-02-19 Per discussione Damouns
Les 11 premiers décrets sur les nouveaux découpages des cantons sont parus : ils entreront en vigueur au prochain renouvellement général des assemblées départementales soit en 2015. Peut-être que ça vaut le coup de commencer à les mettre dans OSM même s'ils ne sont pas encore effectifs...

Re: [OSM-ja] ローソンさんのデータのインポート

2014-02-19 Per discussione yasunari
古橋さん、皆さん、 山下です。こんにちわ。 もう、時期を逸したように思いますが、、、 //一般サラリーマンには、平日の昼間は議論に参加できません。 //申し訳ありません。 今更ながら、かつ、お前が言うな的ではありますが、 今回のような緊急事態のときには、 少々の議論不足があっても、 強権発動でインポートしてしまっても良かったんではないでしょうか。 緊急事態の時に優先すべきは(あるべき論より)被災者に貢献すること。 最悪、役目が終われば、ロールバックすればよいわけですし。。。 というわけで(?)、これを機会に 再インポート案をいただいて(まだですよね?) 前に進みましょう。。

Re: [OSM-ja] ViziCitiesというのがあります

2014-02-19 Per discussione Satoshi IIDA
いいだです。 いろんなデモを公開されていて、非常に面白いですね。 OSMと直接関係はなさそうですが、 交通機関の移動をリアルタイムで表示するのを(たぶんD3.jsで)動かしているコレはちょっとときめきます。 http://vimeo.com/67869313 エフェクト的に映画サマーウォーズを思い出して、とても楽しい。 2014年2月18日 21:38 ribbon o...@ns.ribbon.or.jp: 地図を3D表示するものです。node.jsをつかうものです。 https://github.com/robhawkes/vizicities

[OSRM-talk] osrm-extract build fail: undefined reference to boost month function?

2014-02-19 Per discussione openstreetmap . org
Hi, I'm trying to build OSRM on RHEL 6.4 but am getting a boost-related error: $ make ... Linking CXX executable osrm-extract CMakeFiles/osrm-extract.dir/Extractor/ExtractionContainers.cpp.o: In function `boost::gregorian::date

Re: [Talk-GB] Somerset Levels Flooding

2014-02-19 Per discussione Dave F.
FYI http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/IOTD/view.php?id=83157src=eoa-iotd On 06/02/2014 00:24, Dave F. wrote: Hi About a week ago user Jestr88 added large areas tagged natural=water; name=flooding. to indicate the flooded areas on the Somerset levels.

Re: [Talk-GB] Closure of NPTG-Viewer

2014-02-19 Per discussione Rob Nickerson
FINAL CALL: Last chance to use the NPTG-Viewer before it disappears for good. Regards, Rob On 16 February 2014 15:38, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote: All, In the next few days we will be moving the mappa-merica.org domain on to our new Wordpress based site (blog post to

[Talk-GB] A9 West of Perth - Vandalism - robbief14 again.

2014-02-19 Per discussione Alasdair McKinnon
Hi, First post so excuse me if my etiquette is wrong and Hi to all. I've spotted that the A9 West of Perth is wrongly designated as the M9 and A93. It has also been re-routed over a short length. From looking at the history in Potlatch I can see that Robbief14 was responsible for some edits

[Talk-us] Whole-US Garmin Map update - 2014-02-18

2014-02-19 Per discussione Dave Hansen
These are based off of Lambertus's work here: http://garmin.openstreetmap.nl If you have questions or comments about these maps, please feel free to ask. However, please do not send me private mail. The odds are, someone else will have the same questions, and by asking on the talk-us@