On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 7:34 PM brad wrote:
I'm with Kevin, SteveA, etc, here. In the part of the world that I
live, a map without national forest & BLM boundaries is very incomplete.
A useful OSM needs this. The useful boundary would be the actual
ownership boundary, not the outer
This is great news! "The Map" continues to get even better, and the
protected_area rendering is especially welcome. Thanks to Daniel and the
whole team!
- Doug Hembry
On 1/18/2019 3:59 AM, Daniel Koć wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Today, v4.19.0 of the OpenStreetMap Carto styl
notes. Perhaps there was a database
hiccup?
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018, 18:29 Andrew Hain
mailto:andrewhain...@hotmail.co.uk>> wrote:
Can we find out what software is being used to send these notes?
--
Andrew
____
From: Doug Hembry mailto:doughem...@hotmail.com>
Yes. In the San Francisco Bay Area. Single letters "f", "k", and "l".
Example:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/note/778721#map=15/37.5009/-122.3032=N
BTW, is there a simple way to delete such note comments?
On 7/20/2018 2:32 AM, maning sambale wrote:
> I'm getting several single letter notes
I stand with Greg Morgan and Rihards on this one (and I think, Steve, if
I remember rightly). I watch my email, and read the messages and digests
from the talk lists. I'm old-fashioned and don't even use a smart phone
or any social media (probably the only person in California who
doesn't).
One contrary view: I regret to say that there are still quite a few
"tiger:reviewed=no" roads in my neck of the woods - the south San
Francisco Bay area. I select the setting to highlight them in JOSM, and
use it to remind myself to try to survey and fully tag them. Where
possible I prefer to
ho can provide a copy of the
shapefile.
Best..
Doug Hembry
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
rto/issues ) proposed
> ideas stay under implementation or rejection so nothing is missed
> (though somebody still need to implement it),
>
>
> On Sun, 7 Jan 2018 19:58:54 +
> Doug Hembry <doughem...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> You are right that I raised the issue of
On 1/7/2018 12:52 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 2:58 PM, Doug Hembry
<doughem...@hotmail.com<mailto:doughem...@hotmail.com>> wrote:
Briefly, my personal preference (for what it's worth), assuming
rendering is added at some point for "boundary=protected_area&q
On 01/07/2018 21:11, Andy Townsend wrote:
| To be honest, I wouldn't "suggest that OSM Carto do X" here - there's
| been a lot of discussion already and no conclusions there. What I'd
|suggest instead is that someone knocks up a rendering of California
| based on what it would look like if
ilities for human recreation, but it doesn't need to explicitly render.
I should add that my comments are based only on experiences of my local
neck of the woods (CA State, and maybe the west coast of the US). I know
you have to consider requirements from all over..
Thanks for reading this far..
Greetings everyone..
I have a stake in this discussion, being resident in CA and dealing
regularly with the representation of the various state and local parks,
Open Spaces, Ecological Reserves, water company lands, National Parks
and Forests, etc, etc, with which this state is blessed. It's a
I'm a relative newbie, and here's a question I've been puzzling over for
a while: What's the best practice for tagging a north American outdoor
shopping center? For example, often, on an intersection between major
suburban streets, there are collections of stores, in one or multiple
13 matches
Mail list logo
