Re: [Talk-it] Classification of important bypass roads

2009-04-27 Per discussione Martin Raifer
Am 27.04.2009, 19:39 Uhr, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer : >> 2009/4/26 Martin Raifer : >> >> PSS Sorry for my bed english >> >se preferisci di scrivere in tedesco: talk-de > (but I warn you: ultra-high traffic). >Martin Hi, I think you quoted the wrong guy. :-P Sono gia iscritto anche alla lista t

Re: [Talk-it] Classification of important bypass roads

2009-04-27 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
> 2009/4/26 Martin Raifer : > > PSS Sorry for my bed english > se preferisci di scrivere in tedesco: talk-de ;-) (but I warn you: ultra-high traffic). Martin ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tal

Re: [Talk-it] Classification of important bypass roads

2009-04-27 Per discussione Luca Delucchi
2009/4/26 Martin Raifer : >> Direi trunk. Sopratutto se non ci puoi andare a piedi / in bicicletta >> (superstrada). > > I think trunk is a bit too much... simply because the road has a speed limit > of 50 km/h (I forgot to mention that) and a user would expect more from a > trunk road, wouldn't

Re: [Talk-it] Classification of important bypass roads

2009-04-27 Per discussione Federico Cozzi
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Martin Raifer wrote: > I think trunk is a bit too much... simply because the road has a speed limit > of 50 km/h (I forgot to mention that) and a user would expect more from a > trunk road, wouldn't he? > Furthermore, it isn't explicitly forbidden to walk or to

Re: [Talk-it] Classification of important bypass roads

2009-04-26 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
2009/4/26 Martin Raifer : >> Direi trunk. Sopratutto se non ci puoi andare a piedi / in bicicletta >> (superstrada). > > I think trunk is a bit too much... simply because the road has a speed limit > of 50 km/h (I forgot to mention that) and a user would expect more from a > trunk road, wouldn't

Re: [Talk-it] Classification of important bypass roads

2009-04-26 Per discussione Martin Raifer
> Direi trunk. Sopratutto se non ci puoi andare a piedi / in bicicletta > (superstrada). I think trunk is a bit too much... simply because the road has a speed limit of 50 km/h (I forgot to mention that) and a user would expect more from a trunk road, wouldn't he? Furthermore, it isn't explicit

Re: [Talk-it] Classification of important bypass roads

2009-04-25 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
Direi trunk. Sopratutto se non ci puoi andare a piedi / in bicicletta (superstrada). Gruß, Martin ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Classification of important bypass roads

2009-04-25 Per discussione Stefano Pallicca
> 1) Construction-wise the street should be considered to be a trunk-road (as > it has exits and driveways, no at-grade intersections with other roads, > etc.). IMHO primary seems to be ok, too. > 2) Importance level: The road has - of course - local importance > (classification: tertiary). The

[Talk-it] Classification of important bypass roads

2009-04-25 Per discussione Martin Raifer
Ciao lista! I'm writing to you in English because my Italian is - let's say - a bit rusty. But feel free to answer in Italian: I'll understand it. Now on topic: In the city where I live (Bolzano/Bozen in Alto Adige/Südtirol) there is a bypass road (circonvallazione) wich is a little bit tricky