Re: [OSM-talk] Bad coastline edits in Sweden

On 21/11/2020 10:42, Andre Hinrichs via talk wrote: Hi! Difficult to find, but here are the changesets where i left comments: 93965382 94097597 94134166 And the links to them: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/93965382 https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94097597

Re: [OSM-talk] Bad coastline edits in Sweden

Nov 21, 2020, 11:42 by talk@openstreetmap.org: > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/94097597 > Note that you made comment "And WHY did you delete the island relation for Idö?" in changeset that made no edits (especially deletions) to any relations.

Re: [OSM-talk] Bad coastline edits in Sweden

Nov 21, 2020, 10:54 by talk@openstreetmap.org: > Now he was editing again without any benefit but doing a lot mistakes. > It seems that he is not willing to learn and just do some useless > things. And since he is using the (bad) ID editor it is also nearly > impossible to revert the

Re: [OSM-talk] Bad coastline edits in Sweden

sent from a phone > On 21. Nov 2020, at 10:59, Andre Hinrichs via talk > wrote: > > And since he is using the (bad) ID editor it is also nearly > impossible to revert the changesets which created the mess. ask him to stop using the bad iD editor and point him to the good iD editor ;-)

Re: [OSM-talk] Bad coastline edits in Sweden

lk >> To: talk@openstreetmap.org >> Subject: [OSM-talk] Bad coastline edits in Sweden >> >> Hi list! I'm doing a lot coastline fixings all over the world. Normally >> only with few pain. But since a few weeks the user Aki_Suokas is doing >> very bad coastline edits

Re: [OSM-talk] Bad coastline edits in Sweden

Hi Andre, Am 21/11/2020 um 10.54 schrieb Andre Hinrichs via talk: > Hi list! I'm doing a lot coastline fixings all over the world. Normally > only with few pain. But since a few weeks the user Aki_Suokas is doing > very bad coastline edits in the area of Sweden. I've written him several > time

Re: [OSM-talk] Bad coastline edits in Sweden

Hi! can you point us to some of the changesets where you left comments? Jochen On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 10:54:53AM +0100, Andre Hinrichs via talk wrote: > Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 10:54:53 +0100 > From: Andre Hinrichs via talk > To: talk@openstreetmap.org > Subject: [OSM-talk] Bad coa

[OSM-talk] Bad coastline edits in Sweden

Hi list! I'm doing a lot coastline fixings all over the world. Normally only with few pain. But since a few weeks the user Aki_Suokas is doing very bad coastline edits in the area of Sweden. I've written him several time via changeset discussion but no reaction. At least he has stopped in an other

Re: [Talk-ca] Coastline Question

Adam, I just looked at a recent CANVED File Geodatabase. The coast line appears not to extend into the river. However, and this is a big however, the metadata associated with the data doesn't have sufficient information to say for certain what I'm looking at is actual shoreline. My guess is there

[Talk-ca] Coastline Question

Hello all, I have been moving about the Island of Newfoundland addressing Keep Right! issues and adding missing features. While doing so, I encountered an area of coastline along the Burin Peninsula that appears odd to me. Specifically, the Garnish River here:

[Talk-africa] Coastline and water improvements around Africa

Hello, My name is Andrew Wiseman, I work for the Apple Maps team. We are interested in doing some fixes and improvements to water features around Africa on OSM, such as adding and improving geometry of coastlines, lakes, rivers, and other inland water features, as well as fixing and

Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline confusion

On 03/11/2018 15:50, Colin Smale wrote: The coastline ways with source=PGS are really old and inaccurate. I am not sure of their exact provenance but I think they were traced from some primitive aerial imagery. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:source%3DPGS Tom -- Tom Hughes

Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline confusion

Hi Sean, The coastline ways with source=PGS are really old and inaccurate. I am not sure of their exact provenance but I think they were traced from some primitive aerial imagery. HWM data is available as part of OS Boundary-Line. It shows the "island" ("Inner Trial Bank") is (just) within the

[Talk-GB] Coastline confusion

Hi all, I've been contacted by an OSM user confused about what to do on the coast of The Wash. Basically the two ways: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/2961222 https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/35834999 are both natural=coastline there, but the former, an "island" is inside the latter so can't

Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline and tidal rivers

On 2018-09-02 10:50, Warin wrote: > On 29/08/18 01:46, Colin Smale wrote: > > On 2018-08-28 16:43, David Groom wrote: > whilst in theory I'd say yes, in practice I'd say consensus is hard to > achieve. > OK, I might as well give up now then. If everybody started thinking "I don't > know why

Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline and tidal rivers

On 29/08/18 01:46, Colin Smale wrote: On 2018-08-28 16:43, David Groom wrote: whilst in theory I'd say yes, in practice I'd say consensus is hard to achieve. OK, I might as well give up now then. If everybody started thinking "I don't know why I bother," like I am now, where would we be?

Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline and tidal rivers

Hi David On Wed, 29 Aug 2018 09:09:58 + "David Groom" wrote: > >>There is no consensus. > >> > >>Personally I'm not in favour of the view that any body of water which > >>is > >>tidal should be bounded by a way tagged as coastline. > >> > >>Reasons for this > >> > >>1) Ask any one who

Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline and tidal rivers

-- Original Message -- From: "Mike Evans" To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Cc: "David Groom" Sent: 28/08/2018 19:22:16 Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline and tidal rivers On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 11:09:47 + "David Groom" wrote: There is no consensus.

Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline and tidal rivers

On Tue, 28 Aug 2018 11:09:47 + "David Groom" wrote: > There is no consensus. > > Personally I'm not in favour of the view that any body of water which is > tidal should be bounded by a way tagged as coastline. > > Reasons for this > > 1) Ask any one who lives in say central London "do

Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline and tidal rivers

On 2018-08-28 16:43, David Groom wrote: > whilst in theory I'd say yes, in practice I'd say consensus is hard to > achieve. OK, I might as well give up now then. If everybody started thinking "I don't know why I bother," like I am now, where would we

Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline and tidal rivers

Colin whilst in theory I'd say yes, in practice I'd say consensus is hard to achieve. David -- Original Message -- From: "Colin Smale" To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org Sent: 28/08/2018 12:23:33 Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline and tidal rivers David, do you consider tha

Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline and tidal rivers

arge non tidal water > areas as coastline > > 3) If knowledge that a body of water is tidal is important it can be tagged > "tidal = yes" > > David > > -- Original Message -- > From: "Colin Smale" > To: "Talk-GB" >

Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline and tidal rivers

tidal is important it can be tagged "tidal = yes" David -- Original Message -- From: "Colin Smale" To: "Talk-GB" Sent: 28/08/2018 08:49:01 Subject: [Talk-GB] Coastline and tidal rivers That old chestnut again... There seems to be an open discussion ab

Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline and tidal rivers

I'm with Colin on this. My experience of sailing and reading Admiralty charts is that the coastline is the High Water line.  Yes it looks inconvenient or unnatural - but tidal area as implied by coastline is so important to small boat users. The River Dart Way: 194211894 waterway=

[Talk-GB] Coastline and tidal rivers

That old chestnut again... There seems to be an open discussion about how far up a river the natural=coastline should go. The wiki suggests the coastline should be the high water line going up to the tidal limit (often a lock or a wier) but this can be a substantial distance inland. This is AIUI

Re: [talk-au] Coastline mods leading to problems with other features.

d...@microsoft.com> Sent: Friday, 6 April 2018 03:28 To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [talk-au] Coastline mods leading to problems with other features. Hello, Thank you much for the correction, I reverted my coastline changes , added a comment of " reverted the changes m

Re: [talk-au] Coastline mods leading to problems with other features.

Hello, Thank you much for the correction, I reverted my coastline changes , added a comment of " reverted the changes made in coastline". It will fix the broken relations, hopefully. Here is the changeset for my revert ( 57842079). Thanks Derya ___

[talk-au] Coastline mods leading to problems with other features.

Hi, I have found a few minor problems with some coastline modifications performed by the microsoft team members. Some of these I have fixed myself, others have been fixed by the authors. However Relation: Sydney Harbour (1252425) and Relation: Brisbane Water National Park (5860233) are now

Re: [OSM-talk] leaky coastline, auckland?

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 01:43:09PM +1300, Robin Paulson wrote: > i've had a coastline problem for a few weeks now, i can't figure out what it > is, perhaps someone here can help. > > when i view osm data in osmand, i get a lot of leaks around the waitemata > harbour in auckland, new zealand: land

[OSM-talk] leaky coastline, auckland?

hi all, i've had a coastline problem for a few weeks now, i can't figure out what it is, perhaps someone here can help. when i view osm data in osmand, i get a lot of leaks around the waitemata harbour in auckland, new zealand: land rendering as sea/sea rendering as land. the data is

Re: [OSM-talk] natural=coastline vs natural=water fix and refresh tiles

Ar... > >> For info just in case you haven't seen it, this previous thread on the > "dev" list explains why coastline updates stopped temporarily: > > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/2016-February/thread.html#29068 > > Ok, In fact actually there is not lake with coastline

Re: [OSM-talk] natural=coastline vs natural=water fix and refresh tiles

On 04/03/2016 10:55, Jérôme Seigneuret wrote: ... It is possible to refresh the base water layer if it is the unique solution? For info just in case you haven't seen it, this previous thread on the "dev" list explains why coastline updates stopped temporarily:

Re: [OSM-talk] natural=coastline vs natural=water fix and refresh tiles

On Friday 04 March 2016, Jérôme Seigneuret wrote: > > There is no consensus about this matter? I am not aware of war > tagging... I thought that it was the solution because multipolygon > exist and costline isn't really needed. No - multipolygon and coastline mapping of lakes in parallel has

Re: [OSM-talk] natural=coastline vs natural=water fix and refresh tiles

> > z<=12 is re-rendered monthly or after style updates or based on manual > tile expiry. But this won't do you any good since any change in > coastline tagging of larger lakes will stall coastline processing and > the data won't be updated even if you re-render the tiles. > OK. I understand. So

Re: [OSM-talk] natural=coastline vs natural=water fix and refresh tiles

On Friday 04 March 2016, Jérôme Seigneuret wrote: > > You can compare results between 13 and 12 level. (what is refresh > delay for level <=12?) z<=12 is re-rendered monthly or after style updates or based on manual tile expiry. But this won't do you any good since any change in coastline

[OSM-talk] natural=coastline vs natural=water fix and refresh tiles

Hi, I use OSM Inspector to check coastlines. In european block, I fixed lakes because outer and inner ways of multipolygons also contains tags with natural=coastlines... I removed natural=coastlines but it cause graphics problems on rendering for inner part of multipolygons. exemple Lake

[Talk-GB] Coastline - my botched attempt to re-align ?

A seawall was recently re-built in west Rhyl. As a result, and following two GPS surveys, earlier this week (Tue 20/10) I moved three features on the coast in West Rhyl. These were : the coastline, the boundary of a beach and the route of a cycleway which follows the new seawall. The cycle route

Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline - my botched attempt to re-align ?

Thanks both SK53 and Shaun - I'll wait patiently. On 23/10/15 14:14, Shaun McDonald wrote: > Hi, > > The coastline is updated at a much slower pace compared to everything else, > so it's expected that it won't align for some time in the map rendering. It > could be days, weeks, or months

Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline - my botched attempt to re-align ?

This is most likely just the much slower update cycle for coastlines (which come from shape files regenerated from time-to-time). On 23 October 2015 at 14:02, Bogus Zaba wrote: > A seawall was recently re-built in west Rhyl. As a result, and following > two GPS surveys,

Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline - my botched attempt to re-align ?

Hi, The coastline is updated at a much slower pace compared to everything else, so it's expected that it won't align for some time in the map rendering. It could be days, weeks, or months between coastline updates, and not minutely updates like all of the other OSM data. So don't worry about

[Talk-GB] Coastline bleed (yet again)

Hi A blue water bleed has occurred again, presumably from a broken coastline. I used geofabric to try an find a split. The only one it located was here: http://tinyurl.com/qy3vfjv I hopefully fixed the problem at 12:31, just 1 hour 20 minutes after the problem was created. Unsure how often

[Talk-GB] Coastline bleeding (again)

Hi For the past few weeks I've been getting random blue fill at high zoom levels. Is this caused by the coastline being broken again? When it occurred previously it cleared itself in a few days, but this has being around a while (unless it's been broken multiple times). I'm finding it

Re: [Talk-GB] Coastline bleeding (again)

On 19/05/2015 12:13, Dave F. wrote: Hi For the past few weeks I've been getting random blue fill at high zoom levels. Is this caused by the coastline being broken again? When it happens, right-click the browser and view image. You'll get a URL something like:

Re: [OSM-talk] Broken coastline

On Sunday 10 May 2015, Mike Thompson wrote: I am considering an edit involving natural=coastline involving the Great Lakes that are shared between the US and Canada. This has been discussed on the Talk-US and Talk-Ca lists and there have been no objections to date. As you know the Great

Re: [OSM-talk] Broken coastline

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Christoph Hormann chris_horm...@gmx.de wrote: On Sunday 10 May 2015, Mike Thompson wrote: I am considering an edit involving natural=coastline involving the Great Lakes that are shared between the US and Canada. This has been discussed on the Talk-US and

Re: [OSM-talk] Broken coastline

...And this may be different to the limit of government jurisdiction. In the UK, local authorities' jurisdiction goes (normally) to MLWS (mean low water - spring tides), which is beyond the MHWS coastline. Why am I saying this? Please don't use the same way in both the coastline and the admin

Re: [OSM-talk] Broken coastline

Where should the coastline be ? HWM, LWM or MW. What about islands that only appear at low tide ! On 11 May 2015 at 17:47, Christoph Hormann chris_horm...@gmx.de wrote: On Monday 11 May 2015, Mike Thompson wrote: I don't have a strong preference for how they are represented

Re: [OSM-talk] Broken coastline

On Monday 11 May 2015, Mike Thompson wrote: I don't have a strong preference for how they are represented (natural=coastline or natural=water), but I believe the mix and incomplete implementation of the two approaches is causing rendering issues. At least the OSM standard style does not have

Re: [OSM-talk] Broken coastline

On 11/05/2015 18:01, pmailkeey . wrote: Where should the coastline be ? HWM, LWM or MW. What about islands that only appear at low tide ! The most common definition is mean high water - spring tides (MHWS) ___ talk mailing list

Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Broken coastline

On Sunday 10 May 2015, Jochen Topf wrote: For about 10 days the coastline has been broken and no updates have been going through. This is largely due to some broken mapping in North America where coastlines overlap I fixed the error in the Laguna Madre - making it a multipolygon. There is

Re: [OSM-talk] Broken coastline

On Sunday 10 May 2015, Jochen Topf wrote: For about 10 days the coastline has been broken and no updates have been going through. This is largely due to some broken mapping in North America where coastlines overlap I fixed the error in the Laguna Madre - making it a multipolygon. There is

Re: [OSM-talk] Broken coastline

I am considering an edit involving natural=coastline involving the Great Lakes that are shared between the US and Canada. This has been discussed on the Talk-US and Talk-Ca lists and there have been no objections to date. Background: Lake Superior is represented both with individual ways tagged

[OSM-talk] Broken coastline

Hi! For about 10 days the coastline has been broken and no updates have been going through. This is largely due to some broken mapping in North America where coastlines overlap and some features have been tagged both as coastline and waterways, which doesn't make any sense at all. Please whoever

Re: [OSM-talk] Broken coastline

On Sunday 10 May 2015, Jochen Topf wrote: Hi! For about 10 days the coastline has been broken and no updates have been going through. This is largely due to some broken mapping in North America where coastlines overlap and some features have been tagged both as coastline and waterways, which

[Talk-GB] Coastline broken : blue tiles appearing

Just to let people know that flooding is appearing in Great Britain, presumably caused by coastline problems. I hope I have fixed the apparent cause (in the region of Dunnottar Castle https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/56.94600/-2.19996), but if the problem persists mention it here or on IRC.

Re: [Talk-ca] Coastline or not coastline

En travaillant sur un projet HOT pour Mali nous avons utilisé waterway=riverbank comme dirigé par http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Map_Features#Cours_d.27eau La même page à http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Map_Features#Nature_.28natural.29 présente natural=coastline avec la brêve

Re: [Talk-ca] Coastline or not coastline

vous-même.   Pierre De : Pierre Béland pierz...@yahoo.fr À : talk-ca@openstreetmap.org talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Envoyé le : Mardi 29 juillet 2014 9h01 Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Coastline or not coastline Je disais dans un courriel précédent que des contributeurs

Re: [Talk-ca] Coastline or not coastline

+1 Daniel From: Pierre Béland [mailto:pierz...@yahoo.fr] Sent: July-29-14 14:05 To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Coastline or not coastline Un premier contributeur a successivement modifié, effacé et recréé plusieurs chemins. Ensuite plusieurs autres alertés par des

Re: [Talk-ca] Coastline or not coastline

29, 2014 2:04 PM To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Coastline or not coastline Un premier contributeur a successivement modifié, effacé et recréé plusieurs chemins. Ensuite plusieurs autres alertés par des outils tels Inspector sont intervenus. Tous étaient de bonne volonté, et

Re: [Talk-ca] Coastline or not coastline

. From: Pierre Béland Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 2:04 PM To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Coastline or not coastline Un premier contributeur a successivement modifié, effacé et recréé plusieurs chemins. Ensuite plusieurs autres alertés par des outils tels

Re: [Talk-ca] Coastline or not coastline

Envoyé le : Mardi 29 juillet 2014 15h06 Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Coastline or not coastline Bonjour,   Je sais que ce n’est pas dans la philosophie OSM mais, de par l’ampleur des problèmes potentiels, de tels éléments mériteraient d’être verrouillés, laissant à un groupe ciblé le soin de les

Re: [Talk-ca] Coastline or not coastline

Regarding the remote mappers who are blindly editing local mapper tagging conventions on the St. Lawrence River. In addition to notifying DWG, be sure to also inform the remote mappers. I recognize those two IDs and think they are both a long way from Canada, and thus unlikely to be monitoring

Re: [Talk-ca] Coastline or not coastline

objets dans JOSM.   Pierre De : Richard Weait rich...@weait.com À : Talk-CA OpenStreetMap talk-ca@openstreetmap.org; d...@osmfoundation.org d...@osmfoundation.org Envoyé le : Mardi 29 juillet 2014 16h48 Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Coastline or not coastline

[Talk-ca] Coastline or not coastline

Bonjour, Depuis longtemps je n’ose plus toucher aux rives du St-Laurent ni des rivières des Prairies et des Milles-Iles autour de Laval/Montréal. Je ne possède pas bien les notions de Coastline et de Riverbank. Pour l’instant le rendu à l’est de Laval/Montréal joue au yoyo. Des jours on voit

Re: [Talk-ca] Coastline or not coastline

15h13 Objet : [Talk-ca] Coastline or not coastline Bonjour,   Depuis longtemps je n’ose plus toucher aux rives du St-Laurent ni des rivières des Prairies et des Milles-Iles autour de Laval/Montréal. Je ne possède pas bien les notions de Coastline et de Riverbank.   Pour l’instant le rendu à

Re: [Talk-ca] Coastline or not coastline

Je suis bien d'accord que ces usagers (qui ne semblent pas savoir tout à fait comment corriger le problème) devraient arrêter pour l'instant. Ceci dit, le coastline doit effectivement être corrigé. Présentement, les grands lacs canadiens sont taggés avec natural = coastline, l'embouchure du

Re: [Talk-ca] Coastline or not coastline

juillet 2014 23h40 Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Coastline or not coastline Je suis bien d'accord que ces usagers (qui ne semblent pas savoir tout à fait comment corriger le problème) devraient arrêter pour l'instant. Ceci dit, le coastline doit effectivement être corrigé. Présentement, les grands lacs

Re: [Talk-ca] coastline between Montreal and Sorel, Quebec

again around Sorel? I got one report from someone who tried to fix this and was quickly reverted. Should it be fixed at some point and it's just such a large undertaking that nobody is willing to do it yet or was there a discussion and subsequent consensus to adopt the current state of the coastline

Re: [Talk-ca] coastline between Montreal and Sorel, Quebec

From: perso...@charleskiyanda.com [mailto:perso...@charleskiyanda.com] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2014 9:27 AM To: Harald Kliems Cc: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] coastline between Montreal and Sorel, Quebec The question of where does the coastline end and riverbank start

Re: [Talk-ca] coastline between Montreal and Sorel, Quebec

or was there a discussion and subsequent consensus to adopt the current state of the coastline? Thanks, Charles ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Re: [Talk-ca] coastline between Montreal and Sorel, Quebec

around Sorel? I got one report from someone who tried to fix this and was quickly reverted. Should it be fixed at some point and it's just such a large undertaking that nobody is willing to do it yet or was there a discussion and subsequent consensus to adopt the current state of the coastline

Re: [Talk-ca] coastline between Montreal and Sorel, Quebec

got one report from someone who tried to fix this and was quickly reverted. Should it be fixed at some point and it's just such a large undertaking that nobody is willing to do it yet or was there a discussion and subsequent consensus to adopt the current state of the coastline? Thanks

Re: [Talk-ca] coastline between Montreal and Sorel, Quebec

consensus to adopt the current state of the coastline? Thanks, Charles ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca

[Talk-ca] coastline between Montreal and Sorel, Quebec

is willing to do it yet or was there a discussion and subsequent consensus to adopt the current state of the coastline? Thanks, Charles ___ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Re: [Talk-it] Coastline

Sembra che quello che ho fatto sia stato digerito da osm... -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Coastline-tp5778319p5779252.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Talk-it mailing list

Re: [Talk-it] Coastline

2013/9/28 ramon saxe...@libero.it Sembra che quello che ho fatto sia stato digerito da osm... si, pare che da poco tempo la coastline viene aggiornata più spesso (ho letto qualcosa come quasi ogni giorno)... ciao, Martin ___ Talk-it mailing list

Re: [Talk-it] Coastline

Ok, grazie, non se ho fatto un piccolo danno o no, su osm sembra tutto uguale a prima... -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Coastline-tp5778319p5778403.html Sent from the Italy General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Talk-it] Coastline

2013/9/22 ramon saxe...@libero.it Ok, grazie, non se ho fatto un piccolo danno o no, su osm sembra tutto uguale a prima... se con osm intendi la mappa, allora si, devi aspettare fino alla prossima creazione dei shapefiles che servono per la linea di costa, ma nei dati ci dovrebbe già stare

[Talk-it] Coastline

Salve, se cerco di modificare le coste per farle più precise, ci sono problemi? Non parlo dell'Italia, di altre zone poco mappate... Vorrei sapere se basta cancellare un tratto di coastline e poi ridisegnarlo o bisagna modificare anche il mare? -- View this message in context:

Re: [Talk-it] Coastline

2013/9/21 ramon saxe...@libero.it: Non parlo dell'Italia, di altre zone poco mappate... Vorrei sapere se basta cancellare un tratto di coastline e poi ridisegnarlo o bisagna modificare anche il mare? non va assolutamente cancellato. devi spostare quello esistente, rendendolo piu' preciso. il

Re: [Talk-it] Coastline

Ti ha già risposto in maniera concisa Simone. Oggetti particolari come coastline e confini costituiscono sempre una relazione, perciò non va cancellato nessun elemento (o se lo si facesse andrebbe ripristinata la relazione a cui appartiene), modifica i segmenti esistenti. Alessandro Il giorno

Re: [Talk-it] Coastline

Il giorno 21 settembre 2013 21:37, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com ha scritto: In generale non si cancellano mai gli oggetti per tenere lo storico trasparente. Vanno sempre migliorati gli oggetti esistenti. Aggiungo: siccome ciascun segmento riporta la fonte (ortofoto, mappa

Re: [Talk-it] Coastline

Aggiungo ancora: non aspettarti di vedere le tue modifiche apparire sulla mappa in tempi brevi. La coastline viene rigenerata meno frequentemente rispetto ad altre features perchè il processo non è automatico, occorrono alcuni interventi manuali. Maggiori info qui:

[OSM-talk] Antarctica coastline/shelf-ice import

Hi! The Antarctica coastline currently existing in OSM was imported years ago from rather bad and outdated data. And the huge shelf-ice areas are mostly missing. There is much better data available that can be used to replace the old data. Christoph Hormann and I are planning an import that will

Re: [OSM-talk] Antarctica coastline/shelf-ice import

Jochen, I worked on an Ozone monitoring instrument briefly in my career, and my understanding is that the polar ice caps change often. Are you proposing that we change them every N months? If so, I think we have better solutions at our disposal than trying to delete/reimport huge areas like

Re: [OSM-talk] Antarctica coastline/shelf-ice import

On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 09:57:31AM -0500, Serge Wroclawski wrote: I worked on an Ozone monitoring instrument briefly in my career, and my understanding is that the polar ice caps change often. No, they don't change all that much. Of course they change a little bit all the time, the ice cap

Re: [OSM-talk] Antarctica coastline/shelf-ice import

On 2013-03-05 16:22, Jochen Topf wrote: On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 09:57:31AM -0500, Serge Wroclawski wrote: I worked on an Ozone monitoring instrument briefly in my career, and my understanding is that the polar ice caps change often. No, they don't change all that much. Of course they change a

Re: [OSM-talk] Antarctica coastline/shelf-ice import

On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 04:48:43PM +0100, Maarten Deen wrote: On 2013-03-05 16:22, Jochen Topf wrote: On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 09:57:31AM -0500, Serge Wroclawski wrote: I worked on an Ozone monitoring instrument briefly in my career, and my understanding is that the polar ice caps change often.

[talk-au] Coastline and beaches

Hi Looking as always to get better at OSM and read up on beaches and coastlines. Noticed that coastlines need care so not inclined to play with them too much but a question on the relationship to a beach. Ideally one side of the beach ends in water so should the beach be linked to the coast

Re: [talk-au] Coastline and beaches

Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 21:01:09 +1100 Subject: Re: [talk-au] Coastline and beaches To: brussell...@live.com.au Worth keeping in mind that the natural=coastline is at the mean high water mark, but I would think that the extent of the beach would go out to sea to thte mean low water mark. I

Re: [talk-au] Coastline and beaches

On 8 January 2013 20:32, Brett Russell brussell...@live.com.au wrote: Assuming that I am reading OSM instructions correct the beach is suppose to only extend to the high water mark so the coastline and beach should have a one to one relationship on the water side. But then I have been wrong

Re: [talk-au] Coastline and beaches

Hi I agree that it makes sense to have the coastline at low tide mark with a tidal zone area before the beach but accept that people's opinions on what is a beach differ. I will stick with the approach that coastline is high water mark but as mentioned how you do this from Bing is hit and

Re: [OSM-talk] Improved coastline view in OSM Inspector

On 21 September 2012 20:52, Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote: I have just added a change to the OSM Inspector Hi and thanks for your work with osmi. I hope you don't mind if I take this opportunity to put forward a feature request; to separate admin_levels in the boundaries view. I've been

[OSM-talk] Improved coastline view in OSM Inspector

I have just added a change to the OSM Inspector which now shows even more potential coastline errors in the new Questionable category. Questionable shows coastline rings with possible problems. There are several different kinds of problems that are shown in this way: a) Coastline rings that touch

Re: [OSM-talk] Improved coastline view in OSM Inspector

to detect where the error is. Pierre De : Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org À : talk@openstreetmap.org Envoyé le : Vendredi 21 septembre 2012 14h52 Objet : [OSM-talk] Improved coastline view in OSM Inspector I have just added a change to the OSM Inspector which now

Re: [OSM-talk] Improved coastline view in OSM Inspector

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 08:50:03PM +0100, Pierre Béland wrote: 2010-09-21 Jochen Topf   I have just added a change to the OSM Inspector which now shows even more   potential coastline errors in the new Questionable category. Jochen, it is a nice addition. Looking at the map, I see all

Re: [OSM-talk] Improved coastline view in OSM Inspector

Béland infosbelas-...@yahoo.fr Cc : talk@openstreetmap.org talk@openstreetmap.org Envoyé le : Vendredi 21 septembre 2012 16h00 Objet : Re: [OSM-talk] Improved coastline view in OSM Inspector On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 08:50:03PM +0100, Pierre Béland wrote: 2010-09-21 Jochen Topf   I have just added

Re: [OSM-talk] Improved coastline view in OSM Inspector

On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote: I have just added a change to the OSM Inspector which now shows even more potential coastline errors in the new Questionable category. Very nice. Thank you for this. The questionable category is pointing out some reversed

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik coastline layer

On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 12:21 +0100, David Groom wrote: Just wondering if it might be time for the mapnik coastline files to be updated. It seems over two months since this was last done. I have just updated the coastline shapefiles with a new version derived from the planet-120801 file. Jon

[OSM-talk] Mapnik coastline layer

of the coastline ways, but its going to be easier to identify this if the tiles are generated using a post- redaction coastline file David ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

  1   2   3   >