Re: [talk-ph] Tagging bridges and tunnels

2015-02-19 Thread Ronny Ager-Wick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 That makes perfect sense, Eugene. I wonder if nat_ref is treated like ref, or ignored by most mapping software. Maybe a test is in order. The idea here is that we can preserve the current information in the ref tags without actually displaying them, a

Re: [talk-ph] Tagging bridges and tunnels

2015-02-19 Thread Pierre Béland
Hi Eugene the problem is that either bridge:name or bridge_name are osm standards. This is name that is recognized and rendered on the maps. Pierre De : Eugene Alvin Villar À : Pierre Béland Cc : Ervin Malicdem ; OSM-PH Envoyé le : Jeudi 19 février 2015 7h55 Objet : Re: [talk-ph]

Re: [talk-ph] Fwd: [OSM-talk] HOT Summit 2015 - Scholarship Program Announcement​

2015-02-19 Thread maning sambale
If anyone need a reccomendation letter, let me know. First thing you have to check out is the visa processing. http://summit.hotosm.org/scholarship/ Maning Sambale (mobile) On Feb 19, 2015 5:18 AM, "Robert Banick" wrote: > FYI all. I know many of you have been involved with HOT in some capacit

Re: [talk-ph] Tagging bridges and tunnels

2015-02-19 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
Hi Pierre, On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Pierre Béland wrote: > Taginfo shows that tags such as bridge:name and bridge_name are used in > other countries, but not in Philippines. > bridge:name=* is definitely used in the Philippines. I and a couple or so other mappers have been using it. I h

Re: [talk-ph] Tagging bridges and tunnels

2015-02-19 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Ronny Ager-Wick wrote: > What do the rest of you think of renaming all ref tags to ref:ph? I know > it would make sense here, and probably everywhere outside of Metro Manila, > but what about Manila? > OSM already has a "standard" set of alternative ref=* tags: