Re: [talk-ph] Coastlines - was Forest landcover

2016-02-04 Thread David Groom
>Might be good to probe more. Can you give me sample changesets so I >can ask around. As far as I can see its https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33871982 ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo

Re: [talk-ph] Coastlines - was Forest landcover

2016-02-04 Thread maning sambale
Hi David, I saw a similar ifsar/insar import over Baybay City, which I removed since it overlapped with existing coastline and riverbank polygons traced in Bing. I'm curious who did this but I did not followed up with the concerned mapper. From what I remembered, PH gov acquired ifsar data over L

[talk-ph] Coastlines - was Forest landcover

2016-02-04 Thread David Groom
Eugene the coastline ways which I am improving seem to derive from an import of IFSAR 2012 data (See https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/33871982) So these are after the 2010 mini project to improve the coaastline David >As for the saw-tooth coastlines, I'm actually surprised they still