I agree. I actually admire the detailed landcover areas found in many
places in Europe in OSM and I can't see how such a level of detail
would be problematic here in the Philippines.
As for the saw-tooth coastlines, I'm actually surprised they still
exist to a large degree since we did a
Hi,
I think it is OK to extend the tree cover areas if the basis of mapping is the
present forest land cover. The mapped areas would be actually close to what is
existing on the ground.
On a related note. I just observed that some mapped ares of existing land use =
forest, were based on
I'm not an authority on this, but I can't see a reason why not. The current
lines are unlikely to be accurate the way you describe them and matches what
I've seen elsewhere in the Philippines.
Ronny.
On 2016-02-02 18:17, David Groom wrote:
> Hi
>
> Firstly let me introduce myself, I'm based in
Hi
Firstly let me introduce myself, I'm based in the UK. I've been involed
with OSM pretty much from the start, (I attended the first ever mapping
party), was responsible for a large part of the original worldwide
coastline import, spent a lot of time fixing coastline errors, did most
of
