Hehehe. It was actually the geographical errors on the new banknote
designs the reason why I stumbled onto RA 10067.
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:58 AM, tutubi
wrote:
> you should see the new P1000 bill...there's a map there and points to the
> reef as located near malaysia :(
>
> shame...shame on
you should see the new P1000 bill...there's a map there and points to the
reef as located near malaysia :(
shame...shame on geographically-challenged people in government
--
---
I explore, therefore I blog.
http://www.backpackingphilippines.com
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Eugene Alvin Vi
I have friend who worked on the PRS92 project several years ago. According
to him, there is very little difference between Luzon Datium and PRS92
datum. For our intents and purposes on OSM and waypointsdotph, the
difference would be negligible.
What I did then to convert data that is coming in a
The data (corner-points) given in said Republic Act were in Lat-Long format.
My converter is insisting that I specify PRS92 in Northing & Easting
values (as well as which Philippine-Zone).
How were you able to convert prs92 (Lat Long) to WGS84?
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 7:13 PM, maning sambale
wr
The main reef area is there:
http://osm.org/go/4n...@q--
It is unrendered in the main mapnik layer, click the "Data" in the
overlays to view the data.
The main reef was tagged as subsea = coral_reef, as March 2009, there
wasn't any agreed tag for subsea areas. Any suggestion to update the
tag an
Here's a PDF link of the scanned copy of the law from the Senate
website: http://www.senate.gov.ph/republic_acts/ra%2010067.pdf
It contains coordinates of the park's boundaries in PRS92 datum:
Pt 1 9°04'52" 119°46'10"
Pt 2 9°06'05" 119°48'22"
Pt 3 8°58'09" 120°03'12"
Pt 4 8°53'29" 120°03'
