Re: [talk-ph] no uturn on a dual-carriageway, how?

2010-06-17 Thread maning sambale
OK, thanks for the tip. I'll correct them ASAP. On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: > Maning, BTW, only_left_turn means just that: you can only turn left from the > "from" road. Which means that you can't even go straight! So the two > only_left_turn relations at the Lan

Re: [talk-ph] no uturn on a dual-carriageway, how?

2010-06-17 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
Maning, BTW, only_left_turn means just that: you can only turn left from the "from" road. Which means that you can't even go straight! So the two only_left_turn relations at the Lanuza-Ortigas intersection is wrong. On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 9:57 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: > There should be on

Re: [talk-ph] no uturn on a dual-carriageway, how?

2010-06-17 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
There should be one via: the bit of road connecting the to and from. So Lanuza should be split here. No need to add nodes as via. On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 8:07 PM, maning sambale wrote: > This spot: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=14.589184&mlon=121.071306&zoom=18&layers=B000FTF > > allows

[talk-ph] no uturn on a dual-carriageway, how?

2010-06-17 Thread maning sambale
This spot: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=14.589184&mlon=121.071306&zoom=18&layers=B000FTF allows you to take left and right turns but not u-turns According to this document, http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Turn_restrictions relation turn restrictions should have 3 members (from, to, via)