ng sambale wrote:
From: maning sambale
Subject: Re: [talk-ph] several variations of postcodes in osm-ph
To: "Eugene Alvin Villar"
Cc: "osm-ph"
Date: Tuesday, September 15, 2009, 11:49 AM
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
> I suggest using addr:po
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
> I suggest using addr:postcode exclusively.
>
> Zip codes in the Philippines is really meant to facilitate addressing and
> addr:postcode does that nicely.
+1 here
> Redundancy issue:
> The issue above (of which key to use to store zi
I suggest using addr:postcode exclusively.
Zip codes in the Philippines is really meant to facilitate addressing and
addr:postcode does that nicely.
Also, I don't think tagging streets with postal_code is that useful and may
even be harmful. We'd be splitting streets whenever they cross a boundar
Follow-up.
the is_in:zip may came from data imports.
OSM map features actually recommends two:
addr:postcode - normally attached to an address node/way of a POI
postal_code - same as above, but can be applied to streets as well
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:22 AM, maning sambale
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> T
Hi,
There are several key tag for philippine postcodes in the Philippines.
addr:postcode
postal_code
is_in:zip
Often, these postcodes is attached to a POI. Can we "standardize"? Any ideas?
--
cheers,
maning
--
"Freedom is still the most rad
