[Talk-transit] validator rule for public_transport=platform

2015-05-07 Thread Jo
Hi, I'm getting messages from the validator claiming public_transport=platform can only be used on way or closed_way. This is not true. It can be used perfectly well on nodes. In that case the node represents the position of the pole. I just checked it on the wiki.

Re: [Talk-transit] validator rule for public_transport=platform

2015-05-07 Thread Jo
That's how it was added to the wiki ages ago. Since the start of the 'new' schema. The alternative is to add a new object public_transport=pole and a new role for the routes. This was not deemed necessary back then though. I must say I don't agree with adding the details of the bus stop to the

Re: [Talk-transit] validator rule for public_transport=platform

2015-05-07 Thread michael spreng
Hi On 2015-05-07 10:13, Jo wrote: I'm getting messages from the validator claiming public_transport=platform can only be used on way or closed_way. This is not true. It can be used perfectly well on nodes. In that case the node represents the position of the pole. A platform is not a

Re: [Talk-transit] validator rule for public_transport=platform

2015-05-07 Thread Nounours77
On 2015-05-07 10:13, Jo wrote: I'm getting messages from the validator claiming public_transport=platform can only be used on way or closed_way. This is not true. It can be used perfectly well on nodes. In that case the node represents the position of the pole. A platform is not a poleā€¦

Re: [Talk-transit] validator rule for public_transport=platform

2015-05-07 Thread Jo
There is a reason why we are keeping the nodes representing the poles. They have all the details since the beginning and we need them to keep track of changes coming in from the PT operators upstream. It's also easier to keep track of the history of that particular bus stop. Moving from node to