On 06-05-19 19:29, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
On 2019-04-30 06:06, Dave F via Talk-transit wrote:
On 29/04/2019 16:22, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
Stop areas are supposed to link stop positions to platforms, so a
router knows which platform you need to take a route that only stops
on a particular track
On 28-04-19 16:27, Jarek PiĆ³rkowski wrote:
On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 at 10:04, Markus wrote:
Tram stops often have platforms (and bus stops sometimes too). For
such stops, two PTv1 elements are necessary because railway=tram_stop
can't be used on the same area (or way) as railway=platform (they use
On 28-04-19 16:02, Markus wrote:
On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 at 14:30, Snusmumriken
wrote:
Somehow I think that it is too late to define one schema that would
rule the world. Too much has already been mapped for it to be redone.
But I might be wrong. I also share your observation that PTv2 is way
too
I've been generally ignoring this thread, but did spot the handy summary from
Jarek.
In particular:
> 7. For public transit routing, it appears that having highway_bus_stop
> nodes ("locations where people wait for buses") arranged in order in
> a
> relation is sufficient, per the comments about