On Sat, 2020-07-11 at 02:33 -0300, Agustin Rissoli wrote:
> What are your opinion of adding bus=yes along with
> public_transport=platform + highway=bus_stop?
In the presence of highway=bus_stop I think the bus_yes tag is
totally unnecessary.
___
Talk-
On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 09:45 +0200, Robin Däneke wrote:
>
> Maybe I could find some time to write my suggestions into a document,
> and we could collect the ideas for those extra tags in there too. I
> think it would make more sense that way, than just the addition of a
> few tags to the current sc
On Mon, 2019-05-13 at 08:47 -0400, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
> On Mon, 13 May 2019 at 03:50, Snusmumriken
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2019-05-12 at 20:55 +0200, Tijmen Stam wrote:
> > > It is not uncommon for key/values to be misnomers in OSM.
> > > Clearest
> > &g
On Sun, 2019-05-12 at 20:55 +0200, Tijmen Stam wrote:
> a "public_transport=platform" is not defined as being "platform"
> (raised good concrete flooring) but as "the place where people wait
> to board a bus/tram/train". Whatever form that is.
>
> It is not uncommon for key/values to be misnomers
On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 13:53 -0500, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> On 2019-05-03 12:09, Dave F via Talk-transit wrote:
> > On 30/04/2019 18:34, Stephen Sprunk wrote:
> > > A platform is where people wait to board; if they stand at a
> > > pole
> > > (typical for buses), then the pole is logically the plat
On Fri, 2019-04-26 at 17:10 +0200, Markus wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've added, updated and corrected several dozen public transportation
> routes in the past few years using the PTv2 scheme. As is the case
> with most route relations, they often break (e.g., because the course
> of a road or rails is