Re: [Talk-transit] Tag railway=station on ways and Wiki

100% agree with Nzara. Important to have ONE point for station, and the mapper can better decide where this is then an algorithm. nounours > Am 19.05.2016 um 07:28 schrieb Nzara : > > Hello Mauro, > > concerning your questions > >> Other question that came up was "why is it so important for t

Re: [Talk-transit] different interpretations of v2 PT scheme

seems not to supported by the JOSM verificator). nounours77 > Am 02.07.2015 um 00:53 schrieb Jo : > > I tend to add the waste_basket that clearly 'belongs' to the bus stop, the > bench, the shelter, the ticker/departures screen in as well. Most of the time > t

Re: [Talk-transit] validator rule for public_transport=platform

are then transfered to the platform, and the pole node removed. nounours77 ___ Talk-transit mailing list Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit

Re: [Talk-transit] Simple timetable for ferry?

I would suggest using the opening_hours tag and convert the timetable to this format - if I assume it's right that the ferry is either operated (and it goes back and forth), or closed. see to check your syntax: http://openingh.openstreetmap.de/evaluation_tool/

Re: [Talk-transit] Stop according to new PT scheme not rendered?

g ONLY the new schema, and adapt there rendering accordingly. They more tagger/public transport companies will do the same, the more accepted the new tag will come. nounours77 Am 12.08.2014 um 12:08 schrieb Janko Mihelić : > It only takes one great public transport map with routing, and t

Re: [Talk-transit] Stop according to new PT scheme not rendered?

- maybe hierarchical routes is something you can align to? Anybody for making peace and going on improve PT? Nounours Am 11.12.2013 um 16:32 schrieb Pieren : > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 4:25 PM, nounours77 > >> I really do not understand. > > I will tell it differenty : >

Re: [Talk-transit] Stop according to new PT scheme not rendered?

Am 11.12.2013 um 16:12 schrieb Pieren : > > "This proposal does not replace, deprecate or obsolete the already > existing and well known tags“ Everybody agrees on that. The old tags still stay valid. > > Don't expect that renderers have to change since the proposal states > clearly "it's not

Re: [Talk-transit] Stop according to new PT scheme not rendered?

OSM/PE_PubTransp_zps186b8f3f.png If we fight over incompatible conventions, we will not advance. How is willing to try to make these things move to the better??? Cheers, nounours77 Am 11.12.2013 um 15:57 schrieb fly : > On 09.12.2013 17:09, Pieren wrote: >> I find the answers on th