Re: [Talk-transit] Relations for stop areas in NaPTAN

2009-09-28 Thread Frankie Roberto
Jerry wrote: I've just noticed that the relations for stop places generated in the NaPTAN import do not have a type. I just happened to be browsing through some KeepRight issues and noticed a number of relation without type ones. I think the consensus is that these should become type=site.

Re: [Talk-transit] Relations for stop areas in NaPTAN

2009-09-28 Thread Peter Miller
On 28 Sep 2009, at 14:58, Frankie Roberto wrote: Jerry wrote: I've just noticed that the relations for stop places generated in the NaPTAN import do not have a type. I just happened to be browsing through some KeepRight issues and noticed a number of relation without type ones. I

Re: [Talk-transit] Relations for stop areas in NaPTAN

2009-09-28 Thread Thomas Wood
2009/9/28 Jerry Clough - OSM sk53_...@yahoo.co.uk: I've just noticed that the relations for stop places generated in the NaPTAN import do not have a type. I just happened to be browsing through some KeepRight issues and noticed a number of relation without type ones. I'm sure its unimportant

Re: [Talk-transit] Relations for stop areas in NaPTAN

2009-09-28 Thread Claudius Henrichs
Am 28.09.2009 15:05, Peter Miller: On 28 Sep 2009, at 13:44, Jerry Clough - OSM wrote: I've just noticed that the relations for stop places generated in the NaPTAN import do not have a type. I just happened to be browsing through some KeepRight issues and noticed a number of relation

Re: [Talk-transit] Relations for stop areas in NaPTAN

2009-09-28 Thread Claudius Henrichs
Am 28.09.2009 17:10, Frankie Roberto: 2009/9/28 Thomas Wood grand.edgemas...@gmail.com mailto:grand.edgemas...@gmail.com I think the type=* tag on relations is ugly, similar to the original class=* tag proposed on every element in the early days of OSM. class=* was dropped, as