Hey
We already have public_transport=stop_area and the site-relation in use
with stations. For the buildings with several levels we even have
level-relations.
As these areas are sometimes quite complex we won't be able to map them
all in a simple way.
cu fly
On 18.12.2013 21:58, Richard Mann
I like the area approach. If you were on a platform, or in the station
building, or on the tracks, each time you are in the railway station (or is
it on the station when you are outside, and in the station when you are
in the building?).
So if there is an app that tells you where you are at the
The number of stations is quite small, so people will find a way to deal
with it. Probably by re-adding nodes until the area advocates give up.
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Copro Grammes coprogram...@yahoo.frwrote:
OK!
Just one question: what do you mean saying Having separate node and
Thank you for your answers.
I was also inclined to add railway=station tag to a node rather than to an
area. But some French mappers advocate for the 'area' solution, contrary to the
former version of the wiki, and I've begun to hesitate between both the
approaches.
So I was hoping this debate
Hi,
1. Position of tag railway=station
There are currently two approaches [1]:
(i) on a node within the main concourse area
(ii) on an area encompassing the land used for passenger services (including
any concourse, platforms and associated tracks)
I strongly opt for (i). As you have
