2009/9/4 Peter Miller :
>
> In the absence of a vast building program of new monorails[1] as proposed by
> Bill Ricker, I am beginning to think about mapping some of the more complex
> transport interchanges here in the UK. I am currently adding platforms,
> walkways and steps to the simpler statio
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Peter Miller wrote:
> Bill also talked about the use of the layer tag on some stations on the
> monorail at Disney with the stations at layer 3 and the track at layer 2 and
> I think it would be useful to talk about how we can usefully use layer tags
> for complex in
Peter Miller wrote:
> We would also need to consider slope, steps and lifts between layers
> and the situation where a lift only connects some layers but not all
> of them. A lift is currently represented as a single node because it
> is vertical. How does one indicate which layers it conne
Hi Peter,
good stuff, and I agree with your view that we should tag the "human
understandable" levels. I'm not aware how how precisely these map to
the layers tag (I'd always assumed that this was a hint to the
renderer rather that conveying semantic information), however I see
how that would work
In the absence of a vast building program of new monorails[1] as
proposed by Bill Ricker, I am beginning to think about mapping some of
the more complex transport interchanges here in the UK. I am currently
adding platforms, walkways and steps to the simpler stations that I
know and am no
