Re: [Talk-transit] [Spam] Re: child relations in type=route, route=bus

2010-10-04 Thread Peter Miller
On 2 October 2010 05:28, Michał Borsuk michal.bor...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/10/1 Jo winfi...@gmail.com [...] I'm pretty sure that if one gets the PT companies to share their data, it's not going to be in there with child relations. Usually (e.g. HaFas) timetables consist of a number of

Re: [Talk-transit] [Spam] Re: child relations in type=route, route=bus

2010-10-04 Thread Michał Borsuk
On 04.10.2010 11:09, Peter Miller wrote: On 2 October 2010 05:28, Michał Borsuk michal.bor...@gmail.com mailto:michal.bor...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/10/1 Jo winfi...@gmail.com mailto:winfi...@gmail.com [...] I'm pretty sure that if one gets the PT companies to share

Re: [Talk-transit] [Spam] Re: child relations in type=route, route=bus

2010-10-04 Thread Tiziano D'Angelo
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 11:09, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.comwrote: Personally I suggest that we limit the transit information in OSM to the minimum and leave the detail in GTFS. Personally I would like someone to create a bus-map application using OSM together with GTFS schedules -