The improvement of tiger data accuracy I think was about 2/3 to 3/4 done in
the 2007 set. They listed what had not been improved yet by county
http://www.census.gov/geo/www/tiger/tgrshp2007/tgrshp07nomtaip.txt So
skipping those this time for road data seems probable.
I would guess another big st
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 14:29 -0400, Russ Nelson wrote:
> Dave Hansen writes:
> > Then, decide how if/when it is appropriate to write over the old TIGER
> > stuff with new. Or, to merge it somehow.
>
> I've updated it in some cases. Perhaps only update if the data is
> unchecked?
Sure, that wou
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 11:33 -0700, Alan Brown wrote:
> > Then, decide how if/when it is appropriate to write over the old
> TIGER
> > stuff with new. Or, to merge it somehow.
>
> Be very, very careful here.
>
> Conflation is a difficult thing. I used to work at Tele Atlas, and
> there was a maj
> Then, decide how if/when it is appropriate to write over the old TIGER
> stuff with new. Or, to merge it somehow.
Be very, very careful here.
Conflation is a difficult thing. I used to work at Tele Atlas, and there was a
major project to conflate Tele Atlas North American data and GDT data
Dave Hansen writes:
> Then, decide how if/when it is appropriate to write over the old TIGER
> stuff with new. Or, to merge it somehow.
I've updated it in some cases. Perhaps only update if the data is
unchecked?
--
--my blog is athttp://blog.russnelson.com | Unregulation is a slippery
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 11:25 -0700, Karl Newman wrote:
> Ah. Quite a trick... I seem to recall that somebody had wanted to do
> that earlier, but I think they got discouraged by the difficulty.
Well, time may have made me forget what a pain the original import was.
We'll see how far I get this time
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 11:10 -0700, Karl Newman wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Has anyone looked at importing the TIGER 2007 data yet? I was
> > going
On Sun, 2008-10-19 at 11:10 -0700, Karl Newman wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone looked at importing the TIGER 2007 data yet? I was
> going to
> start coding up the conversion utilities to get started. It
>
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone looked at importing the TIGER 2007 data yet? I was going to
> start coding up the conversion utilities to get started. It appears
> that this shapefile format may have existing OSM converters out there.
> Anyon
Has anyone looked at importing the TIGER 2007 data yet? I was going to
start coding up the conversion utilities to get started. It appears
that this shapefile format may have existing OSM converters out there.
Anyone want to admit to having one? ;)
-- Dave
_
10 matches
Mail list logo
